ECON 8825
Econometric Methods for Causal Inference · 1 instructor on record · 3 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
This course covers a modern approach to the estimation of causal treatment effects. Topics covered include the estimation of treatment effects under unconfoundedness, instrumental variables, regression discontinuity, and a range of panel data methods (diff-in-diff, synthetic controls, fixed effects). We also discuss nonparametric estimation techniques, including kernel regression and machine learning methods, focussing on how these can be incorporated into treatment effect estimators.
| Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge | RMP overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David HughesAssistant Professor · Economics | 983 records | 93rd | 100th | 863 ratings · all classes |
There is no ranking to read here: David Hughes is the only instructor with evaluation records for ECON 8825, so the number is a record, not a position. The RateMyProfessors figure is their overall score across everything they teach, not their score in this class.
Also taught by David Hughes
1 other class| Class | Instructors | Course score |
|---|---|---|
| ECON 2228Econometric Methods | 33131 records | 71 |
Other ECON classes
All of themThe line
All 13 items · means across 3 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
3 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Hughes | Fall 2025 | 01 | 100 | 100 | 60 |
| David Hughes | Fall 2024 | 01 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| David Hughes | Fall 2023 | 01 | 93 | 93 | — |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.