Class record · ECON · MCAS

ECON 2201

Microeconomic Theory · 19 instructors on record · 67 sections

What the course score is made of

71BC evaluations67 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2021 – Spring 2026

—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute

—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.

What the challenge rank is made of

43rdMore challenging than 43% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

90BC — “Intellectually Challenging”67 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of

43rdMore work than 43% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

54BC — “Workload”67 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

This course develops a theoretical framework with which to analyze consumer and producer behavior. This analysis is then employed to investigate the determination of prices and output in various market situations, the implications for welfare, and the appropriate role for government intervention.

The board

19 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Find an instructor among the 19Filters the rows below. Positions are always against the whole class, so a rank does not change when the list is narrowed.

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 6 of the 19 rows carry a mark saying so.

Rank	Instructor	Overall	Workload	Challenge	RMP overall
1	Matthew RutledgeProfessor of the Practice · Economics	976 records	78th	76th	9026 ratings · all classes
2	Muhammed GezerEconomics Provisional	882 records	25th	25th	—no page
3	Shane McmikenEconomics Provisional	862 records	78th	85th	—no page
4	Megan Mccoy DowdyAssistant Professor of the Practice · Economics	804 records	78th	70th	6011 ratings · all classes
5	Haldun EvrenkEconomics	7712 records	39th	39th	527 ratings · all classes
6	Mariana LaverdeEconomics	756 records	40th	25th	1002 ratings · all classes
7	Haydar EvrenEconomics Provisional	741 record	25th	17th	—no page
8	Bruce WatsonEconomics Provisional fewer records	721 record	78th	15th	—no page
9	Ngoc NguyenEconomics Provisional	732 records	78th	41st	—no page
10	Ira AbrahamEconomics fewer records	713 records	43rd	41st	601 rating · all classes
11	Alexandra OpanasetsEconomics	727 records	78th	41st	—no page
12	Michele BiavatiAssociate Professor of the Practice · Economics Provisional fewer records	661 record	78th	41st	864 ratings · all classes
13	Dimitar SimeonovEconomics Provisional fewer records	672 records	78th	86th	663 ratings · all classes
14	Christopher MchughAdjunct Professor · Economics	705 records	29th	27th	566 ratings · all classes
15	Rodrigo Gonzalez ValdenegroEconomics Provisional fewer records	601 record	78th	76th	—no page
16	Sanghyun HanEconomics	685 records	43rd	57th	—no page
17	Emine TasciEconomics Provisional	602 records	78th	14th	—no page
18	Ying WangEconomics Provisional fewer records	491 record	25th	80th	202 ratings · all classes
19	Hideo KonishiEconomics	634 records	45th	44th	407 ratings · all classes

All 19 instructors listed.

How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 10 of 19 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 67 records

The Professor4 items

Clearly Explains MaterialThe instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.

816th pctl

Available Outside of ClassThe instructor was available for help outside of class.

8613th pctl

Brings Out Your Best WorkThe instructor motivated me to do my best work.

827th pctl

Sparked My InterestThe course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.

825th pctl

The Course3 items

Well-Organized CourseThe course was well organized.

8317th pctl

Clear Learning GoalsThe learning objectives for the course were clear.

8415th pctl

Useful Beyond the CourseWhat I learned is applicable beyond this course.

838th pctl

Assignments & Feedback3 items

Assignments Help You LearnAssignments and exams contributed to my learning.

8518th pctl

Gives Feedback PromptlyI received feedback on my work in a timely manner.

8523rd pctl

Meaningful FeedbackThe feedback I received on my work was meaningful.

8213th pctl

Workload, difficulty & attendanceNot ratings

WorkloadHow much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.

5443rd pctl

Intellectually ChallengingThe course was intellectually challenging.

9043rd pctl

Attendance MattersAttending class was necessary to do well in this course.

8316th pctl

Bar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

67 sections · newest first

Instructor	Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Haldun Evrenk	Spring 2026	01	79	79	40
Shane Mcmiken	Spring 2026	02	88	87	60
Megan Mccoy Dowdy	Spring 2026	03	81	73	60
Haldun Evrenk	Spring 2026	04	73	68	60
Shane Mcmiken	Spring 2026	05	84	78	60
Ira Abraham	Spring 2026	06	78	76	40
Ira Abraham	Spring 2026	07	77	78	60
Mariana Laverde	Spring 2026	08	78	77	60
Matthew Rutledge	Fall 2025	01	96	90	60
Muhammed Gezer	Fall 2025	02	90	87	40
Muhammed Gezer	Fall 2025	03	87	86	40
Megan Mccoy Dowdy	Fall 2025	04	83	74	60
Christopher Mchugh	Fall 2025	05	70	66	60
Megan Mccoy Dowdy	Fall 2025	06	77	71	60
Ira Abraham	Fall 2025	07	59	58	60
Haldun Evrenk	Fall 2025	08	85	77	40
Haldun Evrenk	Summer 2025	01	73	67	60
Haldun Evrenk	Summer 2025	02	83	89	—
Ying Wang	Spring 2025	01	49	52	40
Emine Tasci	Spring 2025	02	64	69	60
Megan Mccoy Dowdy	Spring 2025	03	78	74	60
Christopher Mchugh	Spring 2025	05	78	74	40
Michele Biavati	Spring 2025	06	66	56	60
Emine Tasci	Spring 2025	07	56	60	60
Haldun Evrenk	Spring 2025	08	89	78	40

Showing the first 25.

How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.