Carney Curve

Boston College course evaluations · Fall 2021 through Spring 2026, ranked class by class

How this list is ordered

Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted.

Carney Curve — look up a Boston College professor

A surname gets you that professor's record — their overall score, and where they rank on challenge and workload against the whole university. A course code (try CSCI 1101) gets you that class's board. 3,630 instructors, 5,306 classes and 32,066 evaluation records on file.

Don't know the name?

Browsing aid · averages across different classesAll departments

Pick a department from the strip above and you get its standings — every instructor in it with enough records to rank, each with their overall score and their challenge and workload ranks. It averages a person across the different classes they teach, so it is a way in, not a like-for-like comparison.

Top of the class boards

Classes rated highest · 4-record minimumAll classes

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one, so a class rated by six students does not outrank one rated by forty.

ClassRecordsCurve score
PRTO 3300Senior Seminar in Business Ethics15PRTO98+6 easiness
UNAS 3348Cross Currents Seminar: Thinking about Resilience36UNAS90+6 easiness
MUSP 1670Waaw Waaw Sabar: BC West African Music Ensemble14MUSP94+6 easiness
COMM 1060Anti-Social Media17COMM92+5 easiness
MUSP 1660Middle East Astaza! Music Ensemble14MUSP92+2 easiness
ECON 9902Fifth-Year Thesis Workshop40ECON88−2 easiness
BSLW 2299Real Estate Field Projects15BSLW91±0 easiness
PHIL 4932Perspectives Seminar11PHIL93+1 easiness
COMM 1902Digital Storytelling15COMM90+6 easiness
UGMG 1010Perspectives on Management10UGMG93+2 easiness

This ranks the classes themselves, not the people who teach them. Open one to see its board: everyone who has taught it, ranked on their record in that class.

How this list is ordered

Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted.

The three numbers

Overall is the blended rating, out of 100. Challenge is Boston College's “intellectually challenging” item — a question students answer positively about courses that stretched them, so it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Workload is “workload”, which BC reports as one of five bands rather than as a number of hours; it does not publish what the bands mean, so neither do we.

Challenge and workload are shown as a RANK against every class we hold, not as a score. Almost every BC class scores in the high eighties on almost every question, so a raw number there would tell you nothing.

None of the three is coloured good or bad. A demanding professor is not a worse professor; the student decides what they are looking for.

How the blend works

BC evaluations×1.0
Student reviews×2.0
RateMyProfessors×2.0

Each source is also weighted by how many records stand behind it, so a page with a hundred ratings moves the number and a page with three does not. Every page that shows a blend shows the parts it was made from.

Scores are curved

Boston College scores on a 1–5 agreement scale, and it is bunched hard at the top: the median instructor averages about 88 out of 100 on it and 44% of them clear 90. So we rank every figure against the rest of BC and print that rank back out of 100. A 77 is the median, 84 is the top quarter, 91 is the top tenth. On top of that sits an easiness adjustment worth up to about ±6 — the workload rank turned over, so lighter classes gain and heavier ones lose, while an ordinary workload changes nothing — and each page prints it, signed. Nothing here is ever converted into hours. A dash means the question was not reported; it is never a zero, and an unrated instructor never appears in a ranking.