MATH 1006
Thinking Like a Mathematician · 1 instructor on record · 1 section
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
This course is designed for students with a desire to expand their problem-solving skills and strategies. Students will develop a flexible and transferable collection of skills and strategies for tackling unfamiliar problems in Mathematics and beyond, which will be helpful for quantitative aspects of STEM majors. In addition, students will work with select mathematics topics commonly used in General Chemistry, including rational expressions, exponential and logarithmic functions, dimensional analysis, and working with parameters.
| Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge | RMP overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juliana BeldingProfessor of the Practice, Assistant Chair for Undergraduates · Mathematics Provisional | 841 record | 25th | 3rd | 9022 ratings · all classes |
There is no ranking to read here: Juliana Belding is the only instructor with evaluation records for MATH 1006, so the number is a record, not a position. It rests on 1 record, which is thin — read it as provisional. The RateMyProfessors figure is their overall score across everything they teach, not their score in this class.
Also taught by Juliana Belding
6 other classesOther MATH classes
All of themThe line
All 13 items · means across 1 recordBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
1 section · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juliana Belding | Summer 2025 | 01 | 84 | 80 | 40 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.