Class record · MATH · MCAS

MATH 1101

Calculus II · 26 instructors on record · 64 sections

What the course score is made of

73BC evaluations64 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2021 – Spring 2026

—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute

—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.

What the challenge rank is made of

49thMore challenging than 49% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

90BC — “Intellectually Challenging”64 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of

40thMore work than 40% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

52BC — “Workload”64 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

MATH1101 is not open to students who have completed MATH1103. Students contemplating majors in Chemistry, Computer Science B.A. or B.S., Environmental Geosciences, Geological Sciences, Mathematics or Physics should enroll in MATH1103. For further information about selecting your Math courses given your background, please see this link to theBC Math Department. MATH1101 is a second course in the calculus of one variable intended for students studying life or social sciences, such as biology, neuroscience, economics, management and premedical students. It is open to others who are qualified and desire a more rigorous mathematics course at the core level. There are three main topics: integration (definition of integration, basic techniques for integration, and select applications); an introduction to differential equations (with applications to population modeling and other contexts); an introduction to multivariable functions and partial derivatives (with application to optimization in economics and other contexts).

The board

26 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Find an instructor among the 26Filters the rows below. Positions are always against the whole class, so a rank does not change when the list is narrowed.

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 4 of the 26 rows carry a mark saying so.

Rank	Instructor	Overall	Workload	Challenge	RMP overall
1	Mujie WangMathematics	933 records	81st	48th	2621 ratings · all classes
2	Dalton SconceMathematics Provisional	912 records	78th	49th	—no page
3	Katerina StuopisMathematics	873 records	30th	43rd	—no page
4	Juliana BeldingProfessor of the Practice, Assistant Chair for Undergraduates · Mathematics Provisional fewer records	981 record	78th	76th	9022 ratings · all classes
5	Keaton QuinnMathematics Provisional	882 records	78th	57th	7817 ratings · all classes
6	Matthew ZevenbergenMathematics	843 records	39th	56th	—no page
7	Jordi Andres Martinez AlvarezMathematics	833 records	25th	41st	—no page
8	Ioannis ZachosMathematics Provisional fewer records	891 record	78th	51st	8814 ratings · all classes
9	Chi-Keung CheungMathematics Provisional	891 record	78th	44th	9211 ratings · all classes
10	August SchmidtMathematics	816 records	25th	34th	—no page
11	Laura SeabergMathematics Provisional fewer records	842 records	78th	41st	—no page
12	Joseph BoningerVisiting Assistant Professor · Mathematics Provisional	842 records	78th	40th	—no page
13	Erika WardAssociate Professor of the Practice · Mathematics Provisional	832 records	78th	74th	9215 ratings · all classes
14	Nicolas PetitMathematics Provisional	812 records	78th	58th	5619 ratings · all classes
15	Joaquin Ignacio Lema PerezMathematics Provisional	802 records	25th	39th	—no page
16	Miguel Prado GodoyMathematics Provisional	802 records	78th	100th	—no page
17	Zachary GardnerMathematics Provisional	792 records	—	12th	—no page
18	Robyn BrooksMathematics Provisional	762 records	78th	74th	749 ratings · all classes
19	Ethan WintersMathematics	763 records	25th	36th	—no page
20	Andrei IonovMathematics Provisional fewer records	732 records	78th	52nd	—no page
21	Nathan GeistMathematics	746 records	27th	55th	—no page
22	Qingfeng LyuMathematics	734 records	45th	18th	—no page
23	Yongyi ChenMathematics Provisional	572 records	—	76th	547 ratings · all classes
24	Mckee KrumpakMathematics Provisional	542 records	78th	44th	3010 ratings · all classes
25	Siddharth MahendrakerMathematics Provisional	512 records	39th	82nd	—no page
26	Cemre YavuzMathematics Provisional	502 records	78th	55th	6413 ratings · all classes

All 26 instructors listed.

How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 18 of 26 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 64 records

The Professor4 items

Clearly Explains MaterialThe instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.

8512th pctl

Available Outside of ClassThe instructor was available for help outside of class.

8920th pctl

Brings Out Your Best WorkThe instructor motivated me to do my best work.

8512th pctl

Sparked My InterestThe course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.

848th pctl

The Course3 items

Well-Organized CourseThe course was well organized.

8523rd pctl

Clear Learning GoalsThe learning objectives for the course were clear.

8622nd pctl

Useful Beyond the CourseWhat I learned is applicable beyond this course.

827th pctl

Assignments & Feedback3 items

Assignments Help You LearnAssignments and exams contributed to my learning.

8623rd pctl

Gives Feedback PromptlyI received feedback on my work in a timely manner.

8729th pctl

Meaningful FeedbackThe feedback I received on my work was meaningful.

8623rd pctl

Workload, difficulty & attendanceNot ratings

WorkloadHow much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.

5240th pctl

Intellectually ChallengingThe course was intellectually challenging.

9049th pctl

Attendance MattersAttending class was necessary to do well in this course.

8935th pctl

Bar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

64 sections · newest first

Instructor	Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Joseph Boninger	Spring 2026	03	78	77	60
Joseph Boninger	Spring 2026	04	89	83	60
Katerina Stuopis	Spring 2026	05	89	83	60
Katerina Stuopis	Spring 2026	06	90	79	40
Katerina Stuopis	Spring 2026	07	82	74	40
Chi-Keung Cheung	Fall 2025	01	89	82	60
Dalton Sconce	Fall 2025	02	85	81	60
Dalton Sconce	Fall 2025	03	96	79	60
Qingfeng Lyu	Fall 2025	04	72	73	60
Qingfeng Lyu	Fall 2025	05	80	80	60
Andrei Ionov	Spring 2025	03	70	70	60
Andrei Ionov	Spring 2025	04	75	78	60
August Schmidt	Spring 2025	05	87	73	40
August Schmidt	Spring 2025	06	80	75	40
August Schmidt	Spring 2025	07	80	75	40
Cemre Yavuz	Fall 2024	01	44	46	60
Cemre Yavuz	Fall 2024	02	56	60	60
Ethan Winters	Fall 2024	03	70	57	40
Ethan Winters	Fall 2024	04	75	61	40
Ethan Winters	Fall 2024	05	83	74	40
Keaton Quinn	Spring 2024	03	86	81	60
Keaton Quinn	Spring 2024	04	90	82	60
August Schmidt	Spring 2024	05	74	72	—
August Schmidt	Spring 2024	06	87	80	40
August Schmidt	Spring 2024	07	82	70	40

Showing the first 25.

How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.