LAWS 7650
Legislative and Public Policy Advocacy · 1 instructor on record · 3 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
This course covers several matters pertaining to legislative and public policy ideas that are developed and designed to address a range of societal issues and the advocacy work that is required in seeking to have these ideas actually become law whether as a legislative act or as an adopted policy within an executive branch agency. The course seeks to familiarize students with the life cycle of a legislative act or adopted public policy. The life cycles can progress from the stage of idea generation to vetting the idea to building support for the proposed legislative act or public policy to drafting a proposed legislative bill or agency public policy to navigating the bill or public policy through various official channels whether in a legislature or in anexecutive agency and can continue through to certain post-adoption matters such as those designed to maximize the effectiveness of the act or policy. The course will have a diverse set of guest speakers who work on legislative and public policy matters in a number of different capacities, including speakers from advocacy groups and organizations that develop model legislation, lobbyists, legislators and those who work in executive agencies.
| Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas MitchellLaw | 793 records | 25th | 17th |
There is no ranking to read here: Thomas Mitchell is the only instructor with evaluation records for LAWS 7650, so the number is a record, not a position.
Also taught by Thomas Mitchell
3 other classesOther LAWS classes
All of them| Class | Instructors | Course score |
|---|---|---|
| LAWS 2110Critical Perspectives: Law, Context, and Professional Identity | 3080 records | 66 |
| LAWS 8667Legal Practice Externship | 251 records | 91 |
| LAWS 2150Law Practice 1 | 1032 records | 84 |
| LAWS 2155Law Practice II | 1032 records | 83 |
| LAWS 8130Advanced Legal Research | 829 records | 92 |
| LAWS 2190Professional Responsibility | 926 records | 74 |
The line
All 13 items · means across 3 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
3 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Mitchell | Spring 2026 | 01 | 80 | 80 | 40 |
| Thomas Mitchell | Fall 2024 | 01 | 80 | 84 | 40 |
| Thomas Mitchell | Spring 2024 | 01 | 78 | 77 | 40 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.