Class record · LAWS · LAW

LAWS 2190

Professional Responsibility · 9 instructors on record · 26 sections

How the curve score is built

64Teaching74 raw · 12th percentile of BC classes

+2Easiness adjustmenteasiness 84 · 44 raw workload · lighter than 73% of BC classes

66Curve scorethe teaching curve +2 for the workload · at most ±6 either way

Boston College's ratings are bunched at the top — the median instructor averages about 88 out of 100 on the raw scale, and 44% of them clear 90 — so a raw score cannot separate anybody. Every figure here is ranked against BC classes and that rank is re-expressed out of 100, which is what turns a raw 88 — the middle of the university — into a figure that says where somebody actually stands. On this scale 77 is the median, 84 the top quarter and 91 the top tenth. Workload is then an adjustment on top of that, worth nothing at all for an ordinary one. Lighter work than 73% of BC classes.

What the course score is made of

74BC evaluations26 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2021 – Spring 2026

—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute

—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

The class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it — who taught it is the board below.

How is this worked out?

That is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between: the board carries each instructor's own score for this class, and the score above is the class averaged across all of them.

What the challenge rank is made of

3rdMore challenging than 3% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

76BC — “Intellectually Challenging”26 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question. It is not a measure of difficulty, grading or workload.

How is this worked out?

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of

27thMore work than 27% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

44BC — “Workload”26 records · raw score out of 100

One of Boston College's five workload bands, not a number of hours. Higher means more work, not worse.

How is this worked out?

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

This course focuses on central issues of professional responsibility faced by most lawyers in the practice of law, whether in the public or private sector. Included may be problems of client confidences, conflicts of interest, behavior in court, obligations to represent unpopular clients and other restrictions on a lawyer's own speech and actions. Other topics focus on the fundamental moral responsibility of lawyers, analyzed in terms of the rules governing attorney conduct, principles of moral philosophy and the pressures that create ethical blindness.

The board

9 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 2 of the 9 rows carry a mark saying so.

Rank	Instructor	Curve	Easiness	Challenge	RMP overall
1	Paul TremblayLaw	8795 raw · 6 records	75±0 to the score	17th	—no page
2	Stuart HurowitzLaw	8089 raw · 5 records	84+2 to the score	5th	985 ratings · all classes
3	Glenn CunhaLaw	7585 raw · 4 records	84+2 to the score	3rd	—no page
4	Thomas MaffeiLaw Provisional	6879 raw · 1 record	—	—	—no page
5	Nancy KaufmanLaw Provisional	6776 raw · 1 record	84+2 to the score	2nd	—no page
6	Stacy SilveiraLaw Provisional fewer records	5148 raw · 1 record	84+2 to the score	0th	—no page
7	Brandon WhiteLaw Provisional	6877 raw · 2 records	84+2 to the score	3rd	—no page
8	Stacey BestLaw Provisional fewer records	5762 raw · 2 records	78±0 to the score	0th	—no page
9	Edward ChengLaw	6370 raw · 4 records	84+2 to the score	2nd	—no page

5 of 9 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach, not a figure about this class.

How this board is built and ordered

Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Curve is the instructor's score for THIS class only, ranked against every instructor we hold and printed back out of 100, with the raw BC average underneath it; nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Easiness is an adjustment on top of it, worth up to about ±6 — BC's workload item, ranked and turned over, so a lighter section gains and a heavier one loses, while an ordinary one changes nothing — and each row prints the adjustment, signed. The board is ordered on the same figure it prints, adjusted for how many records back it. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item shown as a rank against every class we hold; students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it is not a measure of difficulty or grading, and it is never marked better or worse.

That site has no course dimension, so its figure is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 26 records

Instructor4

Course3

Feedback3

Workload & Challengenot ratings

Bars are ranks, not raw scores. Nothing here is graded good or bad.

What each item asks

Explains Clearly: The instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.
Available: The instructor was available for help outside of class.
Motivating: The instructor motivated me to do my best work.
Sparks Interest: The course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.
Organized: The course was well organized.
Clear Goals: The learning objectives for the course were clear.
Useful Later: What I learned is applicable beyond this course.
Assignments: Assignments and exams contributed to my learning.
Fast Feedback: I received feedback on my work in a timely manner.
Useful Feedback: The feedback I received on my work was meaningful.
Workload: How much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.
Challenge: The course was intellectually challenging.
Attendance: Attending class was necessary to do well in this course.

Why these numbers are curved

Both the number and the bar are the rank against every comparable record we hold, printed back out of 100. BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so on the raw scale every cell here would read in the high eighties and every bar would be nearly full — thirteen numbers that tell you nothing. Each cell prints its raw BC figure and its percentile underneath, so nothing is hidden by the transform. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

26 sections · newest first

Instructor	Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Edward Cheng	Spring 2026	04	69	66	40
Stuart Hurowitz	Fall 2025	01	89	82	40
Glenn Cunha	Fall 2025	02	82	76	40
Stacy Silveira	Fall 2025	03	48	42	40
Edward Cheng	Spring 2025	04	76	67	40
Stuart Hurowitz	Fall 2024	01	87	79	40
Glenn Cunha	Fall 2024	02	88	81	40
Paul Tremblay	Spring 2024	01	100	90	—
Paul Tremblay	Spring 2024	02	100	90	—
Edward Cheng	Spring 2024	03	67	62	40
Stacey Best	Spring 2024	04	63	59	60
Thomas Maffei	Fall 2023	01	79	73	—
Stuart Hurowitz	Fall 2023	02	92	84	—
Glenn Cunha	Fall 2023	03	89	82	—
Paul Tremblay	Spring 2023	01	91	78	60
Paul Tremblay	Spring 2023	02	90	79	60
Edward Cheng	Spring 2023	03	67	64	40
Stacey Best	Spring 2023	04	60	53	40
Brandon White	Fall 2022	01	74	70	40
Stuart Hurowitz	Fall 2022	02	87	75	40
Glenn Cunha	Fall 2022	03	81	71	40
Paul Tremblay	Spring 2022	01	92	85	60
Nancy Kaufman	Spring 2022	02	76	74	40
Paul Tremblay	Spring 2022	04	95	95	40
Brandon White	Fall 2021	01	80	72	40

Showing the first 25.

How to read this board

Instructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.