Class record · LAWS · LAW

LAWS 2110

Critical Perspectives: Law, Context, and Professional Identity · 30 instructors on record · 80 sections

What the course score is made of

66BC evaluations80 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2022 – Fall 2025

—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute

—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.

What the challenge rank is made of

1stMore challenging than 1% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

69BC — “Intellectually Challenging”80 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of

1stMore work than 1% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

21BC — “Workload”80 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

This is a required, one-credit, pass/fail Fall course for incoming 1Ls. The course will introduce a core set of critical perspectives that will give 1L students the basic skills to begin to think deeply about the role of race, gender, wealth, and power in the law, in the law school, and in their own professional identity formation.

The board

30 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Find an instructor among the 30Filters the rows below. Positions are always against the whole class, so a rank does not change when the list is narrowed.

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 7 of the 30 rows carry a mark saying so.

Rank	Instructor	Overall	Workload	Challenge	RMP overall
1	Filippa AnzaloneLaw	944 records	0th	2nd	—no page
2	Daniela UrosaLaw	914 records	0th	3rd	801 rating · all classes
3	Elisabeth MedvedowLaw fewer records	923 records	0th	3rd	—no page
4	Stephanie FarneLaw Provisional fewer records	932 records	0th	3rd	—no page
5	Reena ParikhLaw	895 records	1st	1st	—no page
6	Joseph LiuLaw Provisional fewer records	941 record	0th	0th	—no page
7	Daniel FarbmanLaw Provisional	912 records	0th	4th	—no page
8	Geraldine HinesLaw	884 records	1st	2nd	—no page
9	Amanda TeoLaw Provisional fewer records	931 record	0th	0th	—no page
10	Ana RiveraLaw Provisional	931 record	0th	1st	—no page
11	Aziz RanaLaw Provisional	931 record	0th	3rd	—no page
12	Felipe ColeLaw Provisional	931 record	0th	4th	—no page
13	Mary HolperLaw Provisional	902 records	0th	1st	—no page
14	Maureen Van NesteLaw Provisional	892 records	0th	0th	—no page
15	Brian QuinnLaw Provisional	892 records	0th	2nd	—no page
16	Judith Mc MorrowLaw Provisional	891 record	0th	0th	—no page
17	Laurel DavisLaw	8612 records	1st	1st	—no page
18	Claire Donohue PronoLaw	866 records	1st	0th	—no page
19	Jenna CobbLaw Provisional	851 record	0th	0th	—no page
20	Evangeline SardaLaw	853 records	0th	1st	—no page
21	Heather ArroyoLaw Provisional	841 record	0th	0th	—no page
22	Raul CarrilloLaw Provisional	831 record	0th	18th	—no page
23	Alan MinuskinLaw Provisional fewer records	741 record	0th	0th	—no page
24	Paulo BarrozoLaw	804 records	0th	1st	—no page
25	Lumina SatoLaw Provisional fewer records	691 record	0th	0th	—no page
26	Cheryl BrattLaw	817 records	0th	0th	—no page
27	Karen BredaLaw Provisional fewer records	752 records	0th	0th	—no page
28	David MartinLaw	773 records	0th	0th	—no page
29	David OlsonLaw Provisional	631 record	0th	0th	—no page
30	Vik KanwarLaw Provisional	501 record	0th	0th	—no page

All 30 instructors listed.

How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 19 of 30 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 80 records

The Professor4 items

Clearly Explains MaterialThe instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.

8923rd pctl

Available Outside of ClassThe instructor was available for help outside of class.

8817th pctl

Brings Out Your Best WorkThe instructor motivated me to do my best work.

8822nd pctl

Sparked My InterestThe course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.

8817th pctl

The Course3 items

Well-Organized CourseThe course was well organized.

8011th pctl

Clear Learning GoalsThe learning objectives for the course were clear.

775th pctl

Useful Beyond the CourseWhat I learned is applicable beyond this course.

815th pctl

Assignments & Feedback3 items

Assignments Help You LearnAssignments and exams contributed to my learning.

753rd pctl

Gives Feedback PromptlyI received feedback on my work in a timely manner.

8730th pctl

Meaningful FeedbackThe feedback I received on my work was meaningful.

8624th pctl

Workload, difficulty & attendanceNot ratings

WorkloadHow much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.

211st pctl

Intellectually ChallengingThe course was intellectually challenging.

691st pctl

Attendance MattersAttending class was necessary to do well in this course.

787th pctl

Bar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

80 sections · newest first

Instructor	Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Laurel Davis	Fall 2025	01	74	64	20
Raul Carrillo	Fall 2025	02	83	74	20
David Martin	Fall 2025	03	68	49	20
Ana Rivera	Fall 2025	04	93	69	20
Amanda Teo	Fall 2025	05	93	66	20
Laurel Davis	Fall 2025	06	90	78	20
Felipe Cole	Fall 2025	07	93	68	20
Laurel Davis	Fall 2025	08	92	82	20
Claire Donohue Prono	Fall 2025	09	90	68	20
Reena Parikh	Fall 2025	10	93	85	20
Laurel Davis	Fall 2025	11	83	73	20
Brian Quinn	Fall 2025	12	89	71	20
Aziz Rana	Fall 2025	13	93	80	20
Evangeline Sarda	Fall 2025	14	92	78	20
Daniela Urosa	Fall 2025	15	88	76	20
Geraldine Hines	Fall 2025	16	87	70	20
Filippa Anzalone	Fall 2025	17	100	91	20
Paulo Barrozo	Fall 2025	18	90	80	20
Elisabeth Medvedow	Fall 2024	01	89	71	20
Geraldine Hines	Fall 2024	01	87	71	20
Paulo Barrozo	Fall 2024	01	80	71	20
Reena Parikh	Fall 2024	01	93	71	20
Paulo Barrozo	Fall 2024	02	77	66	20
Elisabeth Medvedow	Fall 2024	03	96	79	20
Geraldine Hines	Fall 2024	04	89	74	40

Showing the first 25.

How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.