FREN 4404
How to Begin Thinking: Aftermaths of Twentieth-Century Literature, Philosophy, History · 1 instructor on record · 2 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
Conducted in English: Undergraduate Elective. Cross listed with English and Philosophy "Thinking," the French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas once suggested, "probably begins through traumatisms." This course will study a series of disruptive and transformative events that have indelibly marked the twentieth century. What is the task of thinking for a European tradition displaced internally by the Holocaust and externally by the end of colonial expansions into other continents? Authors will include Levinas, Derrida, Nancy, Saussure, Barthes, Duras (in English translation from French); Borges and Dorfman (in English and English translation from Spanish); Calvino (in English translation from Italian); and Descartes (in English translation from Latin). A German component (in English translation) will consider Husserl and Heidegger as a counterpoint to the European tradition of Romance languages, literatures, and cultures.
| Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge | RMP overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin NewmarkProfessor of French · Romance Languages and Literatures Provisional | 892 records | 78th | 92nd | 1001 rating · all classes |
There is no ranking to read here: Kevin Newmark is the only instructor with evaluation records for FREN 4404, so the number is a record, not a position. It rests on 2 records, which is thin — read it as provisional. The RateMyProfessors figure is their overall score across everything they teach, not their score in this class.
Also taught by Kevin Newmark
6 other classes| Class | Instructors | Course score |
|---|---|---|
| FREN 3306Narrative and Identity: The Story You Tell Yourself | 410 records | 86 |
| FREN 3307Great Books in French | 59 records | 77 |
| FREN 4433True Fiction: From Philosophy to Literature | 13 records | 83 |
| FREN 4439Painters of Modernity: Baudelaire and Flaubert | 12 records | 84 |
| FREN 7750Reading Jacques Derrida | 12 records | 88 |
| FREN 7780Readings in Theory | 12 records | 92 |
Other FREN classes
All of them| Class | Instructors | Course score |
|---|---|---|
| FREN 1110Intermediate French II | 1858 records | 79 |
| FREN 1109Intermediate French I | 1847 records | 79 |
| FREN 1010Elementary French II | 1434 records | 87 |
| FREN 1009Elementary French I | 1123 records | 86 |
| FREN 2210French Conversation, Composition, and Reading II | 318 records | 85 |
| FREN 2209French Conversation, Composition, and Reading I | 417 records | 77 |
The line
All 13 items · means across 2 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
2 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Newmark | Fall 2024 | 01 | 78 | 75 | — |
| Kevin Newmark | Spring 2023 | 01 | 100 | 96 | 60 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.