Class record · FREN · MCAS

FREN 1010

Elementary French II · 14 instructors on record · 34 sections

How the curve score is built

76Teaching87 raw · 48th percentile of BC classes

+2Easiness adjustmenteasiness 84 · 42 raw workload · lighter than 75% of BC classes

78Curve scorethe teaching curve +2 for the workload · at most ±6 either way

Boston College's ratings are bunched at the top — the median instructor averages about 88 out of 100 on the raw scale, and 44% of them clear 90 — so a raw score cannot separate anybody. Every figure here is ranked against BC classes and that rank is re-expressed out of 100, which is what turns a raw 88 — the middle of the university — into a figure that says where somebody actually stands. On this scale 77 is the median, 84 the top quarter and 91 the top tenth. Workload is then an adjustment on top of that, worth nothing at all for an ordinary one. Lighter work than 75% of BC classes.

What the course score is made of

87BC evaluations34 records · weight ×1.0 · Spring 2022 – Spring 2026

—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute

—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

The class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it — who taught it is the board below.

How is this worked out?

That is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between: the board carries each instructor's own score for this class, and the score above is the class averaged across all of them.

What the challenge rank is made of

19thMore challenging than 19% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

85BC — “Intellectually Challenging”34 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question. It is not a measure of difficulty, grading or workload.

How is this worked out?

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of

25thMore work than 25% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

42BC — “Workload”34 records · raw score out of 100

One of Boston College's five workload bands, not a number of hours. Higher means more work, not worse.

How is this worked out?

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

The board

14 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Find an instructor among the 14Filters the rows below. Positions are always against the whole class, so a rank does not change when the list is narrowed.

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 2 of the 14 rows carry a mark saying so.

Rank	Instructor	Curve	Easiness	Challenge	RMP overall
1	Anthony BevevinoRomance Languages and Literatures	9697 raw · 4 records	84+2 to the score	15th	—no page
2	Matthew FerraroRomance Languages and Literatures	9598 raw · 4 records	82+1 to the score	25th	—no page
3	Amanda CocciaRomance Languages and Literatures	8894 raw · 4 records	84+2 to the score	41st	—no page
4	Michael ThomasRomance Languages and Literatures Provisional fewer records	9999 raw · 2 records	84+2 to the score	37th	—no page
5	Ryan AugustyniakAssistant Professor of the Practice · Romance Languages and Literatures Provisional	9999 raw · 2 records	84+2 to the score	63rd	—no page
6	Said LasrifiRomance Languages and Literatures Provisional	9798 raw · 2 records	84+2 to the score	23rd	1002 ratings · all classes
7	Andrew ClarkRomance Languages and Literatures Provisional	8994 raw · 2 records	84+2 to the score	23rd	—no page
8	Kaitlin KileyRomance Languages and Literatures Provisional	8994 raw · 2 records	84+2 to the score	9th	—no page
9	Hannah VinandeRomance Languages and Literatures Provisional fewer records	9296 raw · 1 record	84+2 to the score	11th	—no page
10	Vinicius Guarilha AlvesRomance Languages and Literatures Provisional	8391 raw · 2 records	84+2 to the score	10th	—no page
11	Adrienne EldredgeRomance Languages and Literatures Provisional	8190 raw · 2 records	84+2 to the score	4th	—no page
12	Nathan KouriRomance Languages and Literatures Provisional	8192 raw · 2 records	68−2 to the score	53rd	—no page
13	Andrea JavelRomance Languages and Literatures	7181 raw · 3 records	84+2 to the score	23rd	866 ratings · all classes
14	Jieqing YuanRomance Languages and Literatures Provisional	6778 raw · 2 records	78±0 to the score	3rd	—no page

All 14 instructors listed.

10 of 14 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach, not a figure about this class.

How this board is built and ordered

Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Curve is the instructor's score for THIS class only, ranked against every instructor we hold and printed back out of 100, with the raw BC average underneath it; nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Easiness is an adjustment on top of it, worth up to about ±6 — BC's workload item, ranked and turned over, so a lighter section gains and a heavier one loses, while an ordinary one changes nothing — and each row prints the adjustment, signed. The board is ordered on the same figure it prints, adjusted for how many records back it. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item shown as a rank against every class we hold; students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it is not a measure of difficulty or grading, and it is never marked better or worse.

That site has no course dimension, so its figure is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 34 records

Instructor4

Course3

Feedback3

Workload & Challengenot ratings

Bars are ranks, not raw scores. Nothing here is graded good or bad.

What each item asks

Explains Clearly: The instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.
Available: The instructor was available for help outside of class.
Motivating: The instructor motivated me to do my best work.
Sparks Interest: The course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.
Organized: The course was well organized.
Clear Goals: The learning objectives for the course were clear.
Useful Later: What I learned is applicable beyond this course.
Assignments: Assignments and exams contributed to my learning.
Fast Feedback: I received feedback on my work in a timely manner.
Useful Feedback: The feedback I received on my work was meaningful.
Workload: How much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.
Challenge: The course was intellectually challenging.
Attendance: Attending class was necessary to do well in this course.

Why these numbers are curved

Both the number and the bar are the rank against every comparable record we hold, printed back out of 100. BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so on the raw scale every cell here would read in the high eighties and every bar would be nearly full — thirteen numbers that tell you nothing. Each cell prints its raw BC figure and its percentile underneath, so nothing is hidden by the transform. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

34 sections · newest first

Instructor	Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Kaitlin Kiley	Spring 2026	01	93	85	40
Ryan Augustyniak	Spring 2026	02	98	95	40
Kaitlin Kiley	Spring 2026	03	96	90	40
Anthony Bevevino	Spring 2026	04	98	88	40
Anthony Bevevino	Spring 2026	05	98	91	40
Jieqing Yuan	Spring 2026	06	75	73	60
Jieqing Yuan	Spring 2026	07	80	60	40
Ryan Augustyniak	Spring 2026	12	100	100	—
Nathan Kouri	Spring 2025	01	93	80	—
Said Lasrifi	Spring 2025	02	98	98	40
Nathan Kouri	Spring 2025	03	91	89	60
Anthony Bevevino	Spring 2025	04	95	87	40
Anthony Bevevino	Spring 2025	05	99	90	40
Matthew Ferraro	Spring 2025	06	94	90	40
Matthew Ferraro	Spring 2025	07	100	91	40
Amanda Coccia	Spring 2024	01	100	83	40
Andrea Javel	Spring 2024	02	83	79	40
Amanda Coccia	Spring 2024	04	91	87	40
Hannah Vinande	Spring 2024	05	96	93	40
Matthew Ferraro	Spring 2024	06	98	93	40
Matthew Ferraro	Spring 2024	07	98	93	60
Vinicius Guarilha Alves	Spring 2023	01	92	88	40
Andrea Javel	Spring 2023	02	80	75	40
Vinicius Guarilha Alves	Spring 2023	04	91	88	40
Said Lasrifi	Spring 2023	05	97	85	40

Showing the first 25.

How to read this board

Instructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.