ENGL 3825
True Crime: Scoundrels, Villains, and Vice · 1 instructor on record · 1 section
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
The old adage "If it bleeds, it leads" suggests an uneasy fascination with crime, murder, and violence preoccupies American culture and media. From the colonial period to the present day, true crime narratives have simultaneously disgusted, riveted, and terrified audiences. Although critics have denounced the genre as glorifying crime and titillating spectators, real-life crime narratives also invite readers to contemplate the ways in which people engage in transgressive behavior that violates societal norms. This course will examine the evolution of the true crime genre to explore how these narratives reveal changing attitudes about gender, mental illness, morality, race, and so on. Our analyses will center on three pressing questions: What are the ethics of consuming tales of real-world tragedies? Further, how do these narratives reveal shifting societal anxieties surrounding crime, discipline, and trauma? And, finally, how does the genre of true crime perpetuate, complicate, or refute harmful stereotypes about marginalized groups, such as racial minorities?
| Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge | RMP overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent PortilloAssistant Professor of the Practice · English Provisional | 911 record | 25th | 31st | 965 ratings · all classes |
There is no ranking to read here: Vincent Portillo is the only instructor with evaluation records for ENGL 3825, so the number is a record, not a position. It rests on 1 record, which is thin — read it as provisional. The RateMyProfessors figure is their overall score across everything they teach, not their score in this class.
Also taught by Vincent Portillo
6 other classes| Class | Instructors | Course score |
|---|---|---|
| ENGL 1010First Year Writing Seminar | 136442 records | 80 |
| ENGL 1080Literature Core | 90257 records | 80 |
| ENGL 3821Sporting Rhetorics: Language, Games, and Culture | 13 records | 91 |
| ENGL 3338Americanization and the Rhetorics of Citizenship | 12 records | 88 |
| ENGL 1748From Loneliness to Connection: The Literacy of Human Connection | 11 record | 88 |
| ENGL 3344American Archives: Memorials, Monuments, and Memory | 11 record | 71 |
Other ENGL classes
All of them| Class | Instructors | Course score |
|---|---|---|
| ENGL 1010First Year Writing Seminar | 136442 records | 80 |
| ENGL 1080Literature Core | 90257 records | 80 |
| ENGL 1079Literature Core for Multilingual Students | 1340 records | 89 |
| ENGL 2221Introduction to Creative Writing | 936 records | 90 |
| ENGL 2133Studies in Narrative | 1634 records | 87 |
| ENGL 2131Studies in Poetry | 1333 records | 84 |
The line
All 13 items · means across 1 recordBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
1 section · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent Portillo | Fall 2025 | 01 | 91 | 90 | 40 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.