Class record · NURS · CSON

NURS 2121

Nursing Health Assessment Across the Lifespan Clinical Laboratory · 19 instructors on record · 46 sections

How the curve score is built

78Teaching88 raw · 53rd percentile of BC classes

+1Easiness adjustmenteasiness 82 · 49 raw workload · lighter than 67% of BC classes

79Curve scorethe teaching curve +1 for the workload · at most ±6 either way

Boston College's ratings are bunched at the top — the median instructor averages about 88 out of 100 on the raw scale, and 44% of them clear 90 — so a raw score cannot separate anybody. Every figure here is ranked against BC classes and that rank is re-expressed out of 100, which is what turns a raw 88 — the middle of the university — into a figure that says where somebody actually stands. On this scale 77 is the median, 84 the top quarter and 91 the top tenth. Workload is then an adjustment on top of that, worth nothing at all for an ordinary one. Lighter work than 67% of BC classes.

What the course score is made of

88BC evaluations46 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2021 – Fall 2025

—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute

—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

The class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it — who taught it is the board below.

How is this worked out?

That is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between: the board carries each instructor's own score for this class, and the score above is the class averaged across all of them.

What the challenge rank is made of

51stMore challenging than 51% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

91BC — “Intellectually Challenging”46 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question. It is not a measure of difficulty, grading or workload.

How is this worked out?

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of

33rdMore work than 33% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

49BC — “Workload”46 records · raw score out of 100

One of Boston College's five workload bands, not a number of hours. Higher means more work, not worse.

How is this worked out?

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

This course provides campus and community laboratory experiences in applying the theoretical concepts explored in NU 120. The focus is on systematic assessment of individual health status associated with maturational changes and influenced by culture and environment. The clinical reasoning framework and communication theory direct the development of nursing assessment skills. There will be four hours of Simulation Laboratory, one hour of seminar, and required media/BB Vista preparation each week.

The board

19 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Find an instructor among the 19Filters the rows below. Positions are always against the whole class, so a rank does not change when the list is narrowed.

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 6 of the 19 rows carry a mark saying so.

Rank	Instructor	Curve	Easiness	Challenge	RMP overall
1	Wonkyung JungNursing	9396 raw · 3 records	84+2 to the score	37th	—no page
2	Alison MarshallNursing	9197 raw · 3 records	76±0 to the score	74th	—no page
3	Kathleen MansfieldNursing Provisional fewer records	99100 raw · 2 records	78±0 to the score	61st	—no page
4	Arlene McGuaneNursing Provisional	9095 raw · 2 records	84+2 to the score	31st	—no page
5	Eileen SullivanNursing	8291 raw · 6 records	82+1 to the score	66th	—no page
6	Laura WhiteNursing Provisional fewer records	8795 raw · 2 records	78±0 to the score	16th	—no page
7	Melissa CapotostoNursing Provisional fewer records	9798 raw · 1 record	84+2 to the score	37th	1001 rating · all classes
8	Kellie LapierreNursing Provisional	9096 raw · 1 record	—	—	—no page
9	Luanne NugentNursing	8193 raw · 3 records	68−2 to the score	69th	—no page
10	Bethany CrokeNursing Provisional fewer records	8694 raw · 1 record	—	—	—no page
11	Christopher CurtisNursing Provisional	8393 raw · 1 record	—	—	—no page
12	Eunji ChoNursing	7988 raw · 3 records	84+2 to the score	34th	—no page
13	Donna CullinanNursing Provisional fewer records	8192 raw · 1 record	68−2 to the score	72nd	—no page
14	Soojung AhnNursing Provisional	7991 raw · 1 record	68−2 to the score	10th	—no page
15	Sherri St PierreNursing Provisional	7887 raw · 1 record	84+2 to the score	31st	—no page
16	Thamarah CrevecoeurNursing Provisional	7588 raw · 2 records	68−2 to the score	39th	—no page
17	Stewart BondNursing	7183 raw · 3 records	76±0 to the score	76th	1001 rating · all classes
18	Sabianca DelvaNursing Provisional fewer records	6879 raw · 2 records	78±0 to the score	63rd	—no page
19	Richard RossNursing	7384 raw · 8 records	81+1 to the score	44th	—no page

All 19 instructors listed.

12 of 19 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach, not a figure about this class.

How this board is built and ordered

Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Curve is the instructor's score for THIS class only, ranked against every instructor we hold and printed back out of 100, with the raw BC average underneath it; nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Easiness is an adjustment on top of it, worth up to about ±6 — BC's workload item, ranked and turned over, so a lighter section gains and a heavier one loses, while an ordinary one changes nothing — and each row prints the adjustment, signed. The board is ordered on the same figure it prints, adjusted for how many records back it. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item shown as a rank against every class we hold; students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it is not a measure of difficulty or grading, and it is never marked better or worse.

That site has no course dimension, so its figure is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 46 records

Instructor4

Course3

Feedback3

Workload & Challengenot ratings

Bars are ranks, not raw scores. Nothing here is graded good or bad.

What each item asks

Explains Clearly: The instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.
Available: The instructor was available for help outside of class.
Motivating: The instructor motivated me to do my best work.
Sparks Interest: The course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.
Organized: The course was well organized.
Clear Goals: The learning objectives for the course were clear.
Useful Later: What I learned is applicable beyond this course.
Assignments: Assignments and exams contributed to my learning.
Fast Feedback: I received feedback on my work in a timely manner.
Useful Feedback: The feedback I received on my work was meaningful.
Workload: How much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.
Challenge: The course was intellectually challenging.
Attendance: Attending class was necessary to do well in this course.

Why these numbers are curved

Both the number and the bar are the rank against every comparable record we hold, printed back out of 100. BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so on the raw scale every cell here would read in the high eighties and every bar would be nearly full — thirteen numbers that tell you nothing. Each cell prints its raw BC figure and its percentile underneath, so nothing is hidden by the transform. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

46 sections · newest first

Instructor	Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Laura White	Fall 2025	01	94	87	60
Soojung Ahn	Fall 2025	01	91	87	60
Sabianca Delva	Fall 2025	02	86	82	60
Thamarah Crevecoeur	Fall 2025	02	91	82	60
Melissa Capotosto	Fall 2025	03	98	82	40
Wonkyung Jung	Fall 2025	03	98	82	40
Arlene McGuane	Fall 2025	04	94	88	40
Eunji Cho	Fall 2025	04	92	88	40
Richard Ross	Fall 2025	05	93	73	40
Wonkyung Jung	Fall 2025	05	96	73	40
Eunji Cho	Fall 2024	01	90	80	40
Sherri St Pierre	Fall 2024	01	87	80	40
Arlene McGuane	Fall 2024	02	96	89	40
Laura White	Fall 2024	02	95	89	40
Alison Marshall	Fall 2024	03	95	90	60
Donna Cullinan	Fall 2024	03	92	90	60
Alison Marshall	Fall 2024	04	99	95	40
Wonkyung Jung	Fall 2024	04	96	95	40
Richard Ross	Fall 2024	05	96	86	40
Eunji Cho	Fall 2023	01	82	85	—
Christopher Curtis	Fall 2023	02	93	89	—
Kellie Lapierre	Fall 2023	02	96	89	—
Eileen Sullivan	Fall 2023	03	94	90	—
Thamarah Crevecoeur	Fall 2023	03	85	90	—
Bethany Croke	Fall 2023	04	94	89	—

Showing the first 25.

How to read this board

Instructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.