MCPL 1070
Philosophy of the Person · 5 instructors on record · 6 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
What is philosophy? What can philosophy do for our lives as individuals as well as for society? This course will introduce you to major themes and debates in the Western philosophical tradition, from its emergence in Ancient Greece to the early 21st century. We will explore philosophy as a practice of questioning and reflection, as an academic discipline, and as a way of life. We will consider how philosophers engage with issues like wisdom, justice, and freedom. At different points along the way, you will encounter questions concerning the relation between philosophy and politics, virtue and practical deliberation, faith and reason, mind and body, and various claims about what belongs to human selfhood. Our goal is to become more reflective and engaged human beings, equipped with the tools necessary to better understand ourselves, the world, and others. Students will study both canonical texts in the history of philosophy and more recent works by authors addressing these topics.
Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them.
| Rank | Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge | RMP overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Timothy MuldoonAssociate Professor of the Practice · Philosophy Provisional | 991 record | 78th | 9th | 9814 ratings · all classes |
| 2 | Andrew SongPhilosophy Provisional | 951 record | 78th | 60th | —no page |
| 3 | Jeronimo Ayesta LopezPhilosophy Provisional | 911 record | 93rd | 42nd | 966 ratings · all classes |
| 4 | Michaila PetersPhilosophy Provisional | 871 record | 25th | 26th | 502 ratings · all classes |
| 5 | Daniel MaryanovichPhilosophy Provisional | 772 records | 25th | 5th | 902 ratings · all classes |
How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.
Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 5 of 5 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.
The line
All 13 items · means across 6 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
6 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Maryanovich | Spring 2026 | 01 | 91 | 80 | 40 |
| Jeronimo Ayesta Lopez | Summer 2025 | 01 | 91 | 80 | 80 |
| Timothy Muldoon | Summer 2025 | 02 | 99 | 95 | 60 |
| Michaila Peters | Summer 2025 | 03 | 87 | 86 | 40 |
| Andrew Song | Summer 2025 | 04 | 95 | 96 | 60 |
| Daniel Maryanovich | Spring 2025 | 01 | 62 | 57 | 40 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.