Class record · THEO · MCAS

THEO 1422

The Sacred Page: The Bible · 11 instructors on record · 38 sections

What the course score is made of

84BC evaluations38 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2021 – Spring 2026

—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute

—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.

What the challenge rank is made of

19thMore challenging than 19% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

84BC — “Intellectually Challenging”38 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of

25thMore work than 25% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

41BC — “Workload”38 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

The Bible has been an influential and often fundamental source for many modern, Western views of God, nature, human beings, a just society, and the origin and destiny of humanity and the world. An intelligent, serious reading of the Bible raises most of the enduring questions that have traditionally stood at the center of philosophical and theological debate. Thus, a thorough analysis of biblical texts in terms of the central concerns of the core curriculum will be the primary goal of THEO 1422 The Sacred Page: The Bible. Satisfies Core requirement for: Theology (Sacred Texts and Traditions)

The board

11 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 2 of the 11 rows carry a mark saying so.

Rank	Instructor	Overall	Workload	Challenge	RMP overall
1	Joseph KimmelAdjunct Faculty · Theology	9415 records	25th	22nd	947 ratings · all classes
2	Yonder GillihanAssociate Professor · Theology	917 records	25th	27th	943 ratings · all classes
3	Chance BonarTheology Provisional fewer records	931 record	25th	4th	1002 ratings · all classes
4	Andrew WaltonTheology	914 records	25th	20th	764 ratings · all classes
5	Daniel VosTheology Provisional	892 records	25th	30th	802 ratings · all classes
6	Austin HolmesTheology Provisional	891 record	25th	17th	801 rating · all classes
7	Peter ValeTheology Provisional	851 record	25th	34th	—no page
8	Jenna KokotTheology Provisional	841 record	78th	12th	—no page
9	Matthew HassTheology Provisional fewer records	751 record	25th	4th	863 ratings · all classes
10	Jenna WhalleyAdvancing Studies Provisional	792 records	25th	19th	—no page
11	Anna RozonoerAdjunct Faculty · Theology	743 records	25th	6th	—no page

How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 7 of 11 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 38 records

The Professor4 items

Clearly Explains MaterialThe instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.

9343rd pctl

Available Outside of ClassThe instructor was available for help outside of class.

9346th pctl

Brings Out Your Best WorkThe instructor motivated me to do my best work.

9138th pctl

Sparked My InterestThe course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.

9232nd pctl

The Course3 items

Well-Organized CourseThe course was well organized.

9146th pctl

Clear Learning GoalsThe learning objectives for the course were clear.

9144th pctl

Useful Beyond the CourseWhat I learned is applicable beyond this course.

8823rd pctl

Assignments & Feedback3 items

Assignments Help You LearnAssignments and exams contributed to my learning.

8728th pctl

Gives Feedback PromptlyI received feedback on my work in a timely manner.

9151st pctl

Meaningful FeedbackThe feedback I received on my work was meaningful.

9254th pctl

Workload, difficulty & attendanceNot ratings

WorkloadHow much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.

4125th pctl

Intellectually ChallengingThe course was intellectually challenging.

8419th pctl

Attendance MattersAttending class was necessary to do well in this course.

8934th pctl

Bar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

38 sections · newest first

Instructor	Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Joseph Kimmel	Spring 2026	03	93	89	40
Joseph Kimmel	Spring 2026	04	94	90	40
Joseph Kimmel	Fall 2025	02	91	88	40
Joseph Kimmel	Fall 2025	03	94	93	40
Daniel Vos	Fall 2025	04	88	80	40
Anna Rozonoer	Fall 2025	05	75	72	40
Joseph Kimmel	Spring 2025	03	92	89	40
Joseph Kimmel	Spring 2025	04	98	95	40
Yonder Gillihan	Fall 2024	01	90	83	—
Joseph Kimmel	Fall 2024	02	96	96	40
Joseph Kimmel	Fall 2024	03	96	95	40
Daniel Vos	Fall 2024	04	91	85	40
Anna Rozonoer	Fall 2024	05	75	70	40
Matthew Hass	Spring 2024	01	75	67	40
Peter Vale	Spring 2024	02	85	83	40
Yonder Gillihan	Spring 2024	02	84	83	40
Joseph Kimmel	Spring 2024	03	88	81	40
Joseph Kimmel	Spring 2024	04	95	91	40
Yonder Gillihan	Fall 2023	01	96	90	—
Joseph Kimmel	Fall 2023	02	94	88	—
Joseph Kimmel	Fall 2023	03	98	94	—
Anna Rozonoer	Fall 2023	04	71	64	—
Chance Bonar	Spring 2023	01	93	85	40
Yonder Gillihan	Spring 2023	02	90	85	40
Joseph Kimmel	Spring 2023	03	92	87	40

Showing the first 25.

How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.