SPAN 2216
Spanish Conversation, Composition, and Reading II · 5 instructors on record · 34 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
Conducted in Spanish Since CCR2 is designed as a continuation of CCR1 we highly recommend it after successful completion of CCR1. Satisfies Foreign Language Proficiency core requirement. The main objective of this course is to consolidate students skills so that upon successful completion of the sequence (CCR1 and CCR2) they will have acquired a proficient level of Spanish. Students will acquire discursive fluency and accuracy by working on the following skills: listening and reading comprehension, writing, speaking and oral interaction. The course focuses on complex grammar topics and extensive vocabulary, as well as on expanding students knowledge of cultural and historical aspects of Spanish speaking countries. Likewise, the course will foster students analytical, critical, and creative skills in the target language through the use of a variety of authentic materials such as literary texts, newspaper texts, and audiovisual materials.
Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 1 of the 5 rows carry a mark saying so.
| Rank | Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge | RMP overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karen DaggettRomance Languages and Literatures | 9510 records | 39th | 61st | 989 ratings · all classes |
| 2 | Fernando BernavaRomance Languages and Literatures fewer records | 974 records | 45th | 66th | —no page |
| 3 | Yohana Gil BerrioAssistant Professor of the Practice of Hispanic Studies · Romance Languages and Literatures | 939 records | 28th | 82nd | —no page |
| 4 | Daniela UrosaLaw | 823 records | 39th | 75th | 801 rating · all classes |
| 5 | Sheila McintoshRomance Languages and Literatures | 758 records | 43rd | 56th | 902 ratings · all classes |
How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.
Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.
The line
All 13 items · means across 34 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
34 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yohana Gil Berrio | Spring 2026 | 01 | 92 | 92 | 40 |
| Yohana Gil Berrio | Spring 2026 | 02 | 96 | 83 | — |
| Fernando Bernava | Spring 2026 | 03 | 96 | 76 | 40 |
| Karen Daggett | Spring 2026 | 04 | 84 | 82 | 40 |
| Karen Daggett | Spring 2026 | 05 | 100 | 93 | 60 |
| Yohana Gil Berrio | Fall 2025 | 01 | 91 | 79 | 60 |
| Sheila Mcintosh | Fall 2025 | 02 | 74 | 63 | 40 |
| Daniela Urosa | Fall 2025 | 03 | 70 | 68 | 40 |
| Yohana Gil Berrio | Spring 2025 | 02 | 98 | 78 | — |
| Fernando Bernava | Spring 2025 | 03 | 100 | 72 | 40 |
| Karen Daggett | Spring 2025 | 04 | 96 | 75 | — |
| Karen Daggett | Spring 2025 | 05 | 100 | 87 | — |
| Yohana Gil Berrio | Fall 2024 | 01 | 90 | 78 | — |
| Sheila Mcintosh | Fall 2024 | 02 | 75 | 48 | 60 |
| Sheila Mcintosh | Spring 2024 | 01 | 90 | 78 | 60 |
| Yohana Gil Berrio | Spring 2024 | 02 | 96 | 89 | 40 |
| Fernando Bernava | Spring 2024 | 03 | 100 | 91 | 60 |
| Karen Daggett | Spring 2024 | 04 | 93 | 82 | 40 |
| Karen Daggett | Spring 2024 | 05 | 87 | 85 | 40 |
| Yohana Gil Berrio | Fall 2023 | 01 | 96 | 89 | — |
| Sheila Mcintosh | Fall 2023 | 02 | 77 | 72 | — |
| Daniela Urosa | Spring 2023 | 01 | 90 | 90 | 60 |
| Yohana Gil Berrio | Spring 2023 | 02 | 98 | 95 | 40 |
| Karen Daggett | Spring 2023 | 03 | 93 | 85 | 60 |
| Karen Daggett | Spring 2023 | 04 | 95 | 88 | 60 |
Showing the first 25.
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.