EDUC 7301
Teaching, Curriculum, and Learning Environments: Global Perspectives · 7 instructors on record · 11 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
What kinds of education are most needed for a world characterized by spiraling political polarization, increasing economic interdependence, rapid climate change, and a global pandemic like COVID-19? This online course will introduce students to contemporary debates about how educators should teach, what students should learn, and how schools should interact with society. The course is global in scope and will require in-depth study of country cases and failed and successful models of change. International students and U.S. students curious about other countries' approaches to education are strongly encouraged to enroll.
Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 1 of the 7 rows carry a mark saying so.
| Rank | Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dennis ShirleyEducation Provisional | 952 records | 85th | 72nd |
| 2 | So Lim KimTeacher Education and Currriculum and Instruction Provisional fewer records | 971 record | 78th | 87th |
| 3 | Anne GoodwinTeacher Education and Currriculum and Instruction | 943 records | 78th | 76th |
| 4 | Rebecca MitchellTeacher Education and Currriculum and Instruction Provisional | 942 records | 78th | 36th |
| 5 | Reid JewettTeacher Education and Currriculum and Instruction Provisional | 891 record | 78th | 63rd |
| 6 | Heather FrancisTeacher Education and Currriculum and Instruction Provisional | 861 record | — | — |
| 7 | Han Gil KimTeacher Education and Currriculum and Instruction Provisional | 801 record | — | — |
How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.
Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 6 of 7 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row.
The line
All 13 items · means across 11 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
11 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Goodwin | Fall 2025 | 01 | 91 | 86 | 60 |
| Rebecca Mitchell | Fall 2025 | 02 | 93 | 85 | 60 |
| Anne Goodwin | Fall 2024 | 01 | 90 | 92 | 60 |
| Rebecca Mitchell | Fall 2024 | 02 | 95 | 80 | 60 |
| Anne Goodwin | Spring 2024 | 01 | 100 | 97 | 60 |
| Heather Francis | Fall 2023 | 01 | 86 | 86 | — |
| Han Gil Kim | Summer 2023 | 01 | 80 | 71 | — |
| So Lim Kim | Spring 2023 | 01 | 97 | 97 | 60 |
| Reid Jewett | Fall 2022 | 01 | 89 | 91 | 60 |
| Dennis Shirley | Spring 2022 | 01 | 93 | 93 | 60 |
| Dennis Shirley | Fall 2021 | 01 | 97 | 89 | 80 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.