ARTH 4314
The Materials of Art and their Conservation · 1 instructor on record · 5 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
Preservation of a (traditional) work of art requires understanding the materials of which it is made up, their condition, determining a course of treatment, then carrying out a treatment. In this seminar, means by which the materials of art can be understood (historical documents and examination in a conservation lab) will be explored. A major focus will be on how conservators determine the 'state of preservation' that is the desired outcome of a particular treatment (which is rarely how the work of art looked when it was newly created). Other topics are conservation controversies (including cleaning of the Sistine Chapel), 'authenticity' (and authentication) of works of art, and preservation of art that may include highly perishable materials, digital media, or performance. Although some of the subjects are technical, no background in college science is required.
| Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Richard NewmanArt History | 905 records | 25th | 30th |
There is no ranking to read here: Richard Newman is the only instructor with evaluation records for ARTH 4314, so the number is a record, not a position.
Other ARTH classes
All of themThe line
All 13 items · means across 5 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
5 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Newman | Fall 2025 | 01 | 94 | 86 | 40 |
| Richard Newman | Fall 2024 | 01 | 83 | 86 | 40 |
| Richard Newman | Fall 2023 | 01 | 97 | 93 | — |
| Richard Newman | Fall 2022 | 01 | 90 | 90 | 40 |
| Richard Newman | Fall 2021 | 01 | 85 | 90 | — |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.