ARTH 3332
Italian High Renaissance Art · 1 instructor on record · 2 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
The course studies the High Renaissance, of brief duration (1500-1520), but whose artists, Leonardo, Michelangelo, and Raphael, attained a level of creative accomplishment that served as a model for years to come. We explore the development of style, artistic rivalry, relationships between patrons and artists, the creation of Renaissance Rome, and competing artistic developments in Venice. This year, we focus especially on Leonardo in celebration of the 500th anniversary of his death. We also trace the development of art after Raphael's death in 1520, to understand how artists reacted to the challenge of the High Renaissance.
| Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amy GolahnyPart-time Faculty, Art History · Art, Art History, and Film Provisional | 892 records | 25th | 22nd |
There is no ranking to read here: Amy Golahny is the only instructor with evaluation records for ARTH 3332, so the number is a record, not a position. It rests on 2 records, which is thin — read it as provisional.
Also taught by Amy Golahny
2 other classesOther ARTH classes
All of themThe line
All 13 items · means across 2 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
2 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Golahny | Spring 2025 | 01 | 89 | 88 | 40 |
| Amy Golahny | Spring 2024 | 01 | 88 | 89 | 40 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.