ADPS 2220
Forensic Psychology · 1 instructor on record · 6 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
This course focuses on key theories in the field of psychology. Forensic Psychology goes beyond traditional interpretations and interventions, to examine the complexity of factors present in any case. Environmental, biological, psychological, emotional, and social factors, as well as acute stressors, are examined to demonstrate these dynamics. Reviewed theories are integrated to provide a critical analysis of forensic cases, utilizing a comprehensive evaluation and threading in all key information. Moving beyond the acute care system and community guidelines for assessing clinical needs, this course promotes an in-depth review of all factors, inclusive of historical data, risk factors, mitigating factors, forensic assessment of clinical needs, treatment planning, as well as the use of multi-disciplinary and integrated approaches (for example threading in the behavioral health system with the criminal justice system). This course also examines how forensic psychology applies in court systems, state hospitals, correctional facilities, law enforcement work, and overall community care. Given the increasing complexity and acuity in clinical presentations, co-occurrence disorders, and contact with the criminal justice system as a result of increased risk factors, the field of forensic psychology is critical to the well-being of the individual, the community, and the system as a whole.
| Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joanne BarrosAdvancing Studies | 956 records | 86th | 82nd |
There is no ranking to read here: Joanne Barros is the only instructor with evaluation records for ADPS 2220, so the number is a record, not a position.
Also taught by Joanne Barros
1 other class| Class | Instructors | Course score |
|---|---|---|
| ADPS 2243Personality Theories | 22 records | 91 |
Other ADPS classes
All of them| Class | Instructors | Course score |
|---|---|---|
| ADPS 1100Introductory Psychology | 35 records | 92 |
| ADPS 1153Research Methods for the Social Sciences | 15 records | 80 |
| ADPS 2272Cognitive Psychology | 35 records | 86 |
| ADPS 4001Psychology in Context | 15 records | 84 |
| ADPS 2101Positive Psychology | 14 records | 92 |
| ADPS 2210Industrial and Organizational Psychology | 14 records | 87 |
The line
All 13 items · means across 6 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
6 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joanne Barros | Spring 2026 | 01 | 92 | 88 | 60 |
| Joanne Barros | Fall 2025 | 01 | 91 | 96 | — |
| Joanne Barros | Summer 2025 | 01 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Joanne Barros | Spring 2025 | 01 | 96 | 93 | 60 |
| Joanne Barros | Summer 2024 | 01 | 95 | 80 | 80 |
| Joanne Barros | Spring 2023 | 01 | 93 | 89 | 60 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.