ADPS 2101
Positive Psychology · 1 instructor on record · 4 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
Psychology has often focused on deficits and disability. Recently, however, added focus and research has been placed on the more positive aspects of human life. This course is designed to provide a systemic understanding of what we have learned about human capacity related to positive characteristics and processes, and how these tenets and skills can be learned and applied to improve our well-being. We will explore how a variety of components including biology, emotions, personality, lifestyle, culture, and environment continually interact in a dynamic process to promote a fulfilling and flourishing life. The course will foster creative thinking about concepts and methods of positive psychology. While focusing on each person's unique potential for growth and development, social and professional contexts will also be emphasized, such as thriving within communities and organizations. Students will be encouraged to think critically about well-being and integrate their own personal experiences.
| Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emilie Clucas LeadermanAdvancing Studies | 904 records | 78th | 34th |
There is no ranking to read here: Emilie Clucas Leaderman is the only instructor with evaluation records for ADPS 2101, so the number is a record, not a position.
Other ADPS classes
All of them| Class | Instructors | Course score |
|---|---|---|
| ADPS 2220Forensic Psychology | 16 records | 91 |
| ADPS 1100Introductory Psychology | 35 records | 92 |
| ADPS 1153Research Methods for the Social Sciences | 15 records | 80 |
| ADPS 2272Cognitive Psychology | 35 records | 86 |
| ADPS 4001Psychology in Context | 15 records | 84 |
| ADPS 2210Industrial and Organizational Psychology | 14 records | 87 |
The line
All 13 items · means across 4 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
4 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilie Clucas Leaderman | Summer 2025 | 01 | 86 | 86 | 60 |
| Emilie Clucas Leaderman | Summer 2024 | 01 | 90 | 95 | 60 |
| Emilie Clucas Leaderman | Summer 2023 | 01 | 95 | 100 | — |
| Emilie Clucas Leaderman | Summer 2022 | 01 | 88 | 88 | — |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.