ADPL 1700
Philosophy of Empathy: What Does it Mean to Know Each Other? · 1 instructor on record · 1 section
Boston College's ratings are bunched at the top — the median instructor averages about 88 out of 100 on the raw scale, and 44% of them clear 90 — so a raw score cannot separate anybody. Every figure here is ranked against BC classes and that rank is re-expressed out of 100, which is what turns a raw 88 — the middle of the university — into a figure that says where somebody actually stands. On this scale 77 is the median, 84 the top quarter and 91 the top tenth. Workload is then an adjustment on top of that, worth nothing at all for an ordinary one. Boston College's workload question was not reported in these records, so easiness could not be worked out. That is missing data, not a heavy class — and it takes nothing off the score.
The class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it — who taught it is the board below.
How is this worked out?
That is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between: the board carries each instructor's own score for this class, and the score above is the class averaged across all of them.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question. It is not a measure of difficulty, grading or workload.
How is this worked out?
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Not reported in these records — which is missing data, not a light class.
How is this worked out?
Boston College's workload question was not reported in these records, so there is nothing to show. That is missing data, not a light class.
This course explores philosophical approaches to the nature of empathy and its fundamental role in the human experience. A number of philosophers have taken up the question of empathy, and when we examine their work we see that asking what empathy is leads us to questions about what it means to be a human person, how we live in and encounter the world around us, and what it means to be in community with other persons. By encountering and analyzing theories on empathy in this course, students will work toward deepening their own understanding and developing their own ideas on empathy, community, and the nature of the human person.
| Instructor | Curve | Easiness | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michaela Sobrak-SeatonAdvancing Studies Provisional | 8995 raw · 1 record | — | 56th |
There is no ranking to read here: Michaela Sobrak-Seaton is the only instructor with evaluation records for ADPL 1700, so the number is a record, not a position. It rests on 1 record, which is thin — read it as provisional.
Also taught by Michaela Sobrak-Seaton
2 other classesOther ADPL classes
All of them| Class | Instructors | Course score |
|---|---|---|
| ADPL 1500Ethics | 413 records | 89 |
| ADPL 1800World Philosophies | 18 records | 90 |
| ADPL 2011True Detectives: Investigating the Crimes and Mysteries of Existence | 18 records | 90 |
| ADPL 1070Philosophy of the Person I | 36 records | 83 |
| ADPL 1483Philosophy of Human Sexuality | 14 records | 91 |
| ADPL 1498Philosophy of Cinema | 14 records | 95 |
The line
All 13 items · means across 1 recordBars are ranks, not raw scores. Nothing here is graded good or bad. 1 of 13 questions were not reported and are left out rather than shown as zero.
What each item asks
- Explains Clearly
- The instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.
- Available
- The instructor was available for help outside of class.
- Motivating
- The instructor motivated me to do my best work.
- Sparks Interest
- The course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.
- Organized
- The course was well organized.
- Clear Goals
- The learning objectives for the course were clear.
- Useful Later
- What I learned is applicable beyond this course.
- Assignments
- Assignments and exams contributed to my learning.
- Fast Feedback
- I received feedback on my work in a timely manner.
- Useful Feedback
- The feedback I received on my work was meaningful.
- Challenge
- The course was intellectually challenging.
- Attendance
- Attending class was necessary to do well in this course.
Why these numbers are curved
Both the number and the bar are the rank against every comparable record we hold, printed back out of 100. BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so on the raw scale every cell here would read in the high eighties and every bar would be nearly full — thirteen numbers that tell you nothing. Each cell prints its raw BC figure and its percentile underneath, so nothing is hidden by the transform. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
1 section · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michaela Sobrak-Seaton | Midterm Spring 2026 | 01 | 95 | 96 | — |
How to read this board
Instructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.