ADIT 1400
Python · 1 instructor on record · 3 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
This course is meant for any student interested in learning computer programming concepts with the Python programming language. We will cultivate our problem-solving abilities as we develop programs in Python. This course is suitable for students with little to no programming experience. The course will start with the basics as we discuss logical decisions and loops. Further, we will explore Python data structures such as tuples, sets, lists, and dictionaries. We will couple this knowledge to make our own classes as we learn about object-oriented programming. Throughout the semester we will discover and implement basic debugging techniques. By the end of this course, students will compose Python programs that solve problems on their own.
| Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|
| John RussoAdvancing Studies | 863 records | 87th | 33rd |
There is no ranking to read here: John Russo is the only instructor with evaluation records for ADIT 1400, so the number is a record, not a position.
Also taught by John Russo
4 other classesOther ADIT classes
All of themThe line
All 13 items · means across 3 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
3 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Russo | Spring 2026 | 01 | 89 | 83 | 60 |
| John Russo | Fall 2025 | 01 | 87 | 73 | 60 |
| John Russo | Summer 2025 | 01 | 83 | 77 | 100 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.