Instructor record · Computer Science · Fall 2022 – Spring 2026

Emily Prud'hommeaux

Associate Professor · Computer Science · 9 evaluation records across 6 classes

On each class's board

CSCI 3349only instructor on recordCSCI 10901st of 4 instructors ProvisionalCSCI 11013rd of 11 instructors ProvisionalCSCI 22531st of 3 instructors ProvisionalCSCI 2349only instructor on record ProvisionalCSCI 4900only instructor on record Provisional

What the overall is made of

89BC evaluations9 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2022 – Spring 2026

—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute

—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

Sources are averaged by how much we trust each one and by how many records sit behind it, so a handful of reviews nudges the number rather than replacing it.

What the challenge rank is made of

—BC — “Intellectually Challenging”9 records — does not contribute

Boston College's “intellectually challenging” question was not reported in these records, so there is nothing to show. That is missing data, not an easy class.

What the workload rank is made of

—BC — “Workload”9 records — does not contribute

Boston College's workload question was not reported in these records, so there is nothing to show. That is missing data, not a light class.

The line

All 13 items · means across 9 records

Nothing reported

None of the evaluation questions were reported for these records.

Class by class

6 classes · 9 sections

How each position is worked outPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted.

CSCI 3349 Natural Language ProcessingOvr91Chal—Work—

On this class's boardonly instructor on record

3 sections on record · course itself rated 87 out of 100. See the full board for CSCI 3349.

Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Spring 2026	01	97	90	—
Spring 2025	01	89	85	—
Fall 2022	01	87	88	—

All 13 items for CSCI 3349

Nothing reported

None of the evaluation questions were reported for these records.

CSCI 1090 Data Science PrinciplesOvr84Chal—Work—

On this class's board1st of 4 instructors Provisional

2 sections on record · course itself rated 84 out of 100. See the full board for CSCI 1090.

Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Fall 2024	01	85	84	—
Spring 2024	01	82	83	—

All 13 items for CSCI 1090

Nothing reported

None of the evaluation questions were reported for these records.

CSCI 1101 Computer Science IOvr80Chal—Work—

On this class's board3rd of 11 instructors Provisional

1 section on record · course itself rated 77 out of 100. See the full board for CSCI 1101.

Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Fall 2022	05	80	77	—

All 13 items for CSCI 1101

Nothing reported

None of the evaluation questions were reported for these records.

CSCI 2253 Documenting and Preserving Indigenous Languages with Data ScienceOvr97Chal—Work—

On this class's board1st of 3 instructors Provisional

1 section on record · course itself rated 94 out of 100. See the full board for CSCI 2253.

Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Spring 2024	01	97	94	—

All 13 items for CSCI 2253

Nothing reported

None of the evaluation questions were reported for these records.

CSCI 2349 Text ProcessingOvr95Chal—Work—

On this class's boardonly instructor on record Provisional

1 section on record · course itself rated 89 out of 100. See the full board for CSCI 2349.

Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Fall 2023	01	95	89	—

All 13 items for CSCI 2349

Nothing reported

None of the evaluation questions were reported for these records.

CSCI 4900 Data Science CapstoneOvr91Chal—Work—

On this class's boardonly instructor on record Provisional

1 section on record · course itself rated 84 out of 100. See the full board for CSCI 4900.

Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Fall 2025	01	91	84	—

All 13 items for CSCI 4900

Nothing reported

None of the evaluation questions were reported for these records.

How to read this pageScores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Almost every class scores high on that scale (the median is about 90), so challenge and workload are shown as a rank against every instructor we hold rather than as a score; the raw figure is in the breakdown above. Neither describes quality, and neither is ever marked better or worse anywhere on this site. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero. The position printed against each class is this instructor's place on that class's own board, computed from the same records the board itself is built from.