UNCP 4609
Gathering with Purpose: The Architecture of Belonging · 2 instructors on record · 2 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
As college seniors prepare to transition into the next phase of their lives, one of the most crucial aspects of their post-graduate journey is the ability to engage in meaningful connections and gatherings. This course explores the importance of building community after college by examining the ways in which intentional gatherings can enrich personal, professional, and societal life. Through a combination of theory and practice, students will explore the dynamics of creating impactful events, whether informal meetups, social gatherings, or organized professional spaces, and how these interactions shape long-term relationships.Central to this course is the study of historical gatherings across a wide range of contextspolitical, social, and cultural. From pivotal moments in history like political protests, grassroots movements, and social justice campaigns, to the powerful role of sports gatherings, community festivals, and social clubs, students will analyze how different types of events have influenced collective action and progress. By understanding these historical gatherings, students will gain insight into how modern communities can be shaped and mobilized in similar ways. Throughout the course, students will reflect on their own experiences with community in college, assess the role of belonging in their personal development, and learn strategies for cultivating spaces that encourage connection in a rapidly changing world. Emphasizing communication, collaboration, and emotional intelligence, students will gain practical tools for facilitating gatherings that foster meaningful engagementwhether in social, professional, or civic contexts.
Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them.
| Rank | Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alison MarshallNursing Provisional | 1001 record | 25th | 23rd |
| 2 | Kathryn DaltonEducational Leadership and Higher Education Provisional | 1001 record | 25th | 23rd |
How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.
Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 2 of 2 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row.
The line
All 13 items · means across 2 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
2 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Marshall | Fall 2025 | 01 | 100 | 100 | 40 |
| Kathryn Dalton | Fall 2025 | 01 | 100 | 100 | 40 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.