Class record · UNAS · MCAS

UNAS 3337

Cross Currents: Thinking about Multicultural Leadership · 12 instructors on record · 24 sections

How the curve score is built

65Teaching75 raw · 14th percentile of BC classes

+6Easiness adjustmenteasiness 99 · 23 raw workload · lighter than 99% of BC classes

71Curve scorethe teaching curve +6 for the workload · at most ±6 either way

Boston College's ratings are bunched at the top — the median instructor averages about 88 out of 100 on the raw scale, and 44% of them clear 90 — so a raw score cannot separate anybody. Every figure here is ranked against BC classes and that rank is re-expressed out of 100, which is what turns a raw 88 — the middle of the university — into a figure that says where somebody actually stands. On this scale 77 is the median, 84 the top quarter and 91 the top tenth. Workload is then an adjustment on top of that, worth nothing at all for an ordinary one. Lighter work than almost every one of the BC classes we hold.

What the course score is made of

75BC evaluations24 records · weight ×1.0 · Spring 2022 – Spring 2026

—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute

—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

The class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it — who taught it is the board below.

How is this worked out?

That is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between: the board carries each instructor's own score for this class, and the score above is the class averaged across all of them.

What the challenge rank is made of

1stMore challenging than 1% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

70BC — “Intellectually Challenging”24 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question. It is not a measure of difficulty, grading or workload.

How is this worked out?

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of

1stMore work than 1% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

23BC — “Workload”24 records · raw score out of 100

One of Boston College's five workload bands, not a number of hours. Higher means more work, not worse.

How is this worked out?

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

The board

12 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Find an instructor among the 12Filters the rows below. Positions are always against the whole class, so a rank does not change when the list is narrowed.

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 1 of the 12 rows carry a mark saying so.

Rank	Instructor	Curve	Easiness	Challenge	RMP overall
1	Phionna-Cayola ClaudeUniversity and Capstone	9093 raw · 4 records	99+6 to the score	5th	—no page
2	Kylie WindeckerUniversity and Capstone	8288 raw · 3 records	99+6 to the score	0th	—no page
3	Mitchell StrzepekUniversity and Capstone	8085 raw · 5 records	99+6 to the score	1st	—no page
4	Howard ThrasherUniversity and Capstone fewer records	8186 raw · 3 records	99+6 to the score	0th	1001 rating · all classes
5	Kristin ReedUniversity and Capstone Provisional	8086 raw · 2 records	99+6 to the score	3rd	—no page
6	Jasmine MahoneyUniversity and Capstone Provisional	7883 raw · 1 record	99+6 to the score	0th	—no page
7	Alison ParkUniversity and Capstone Provisional	7682 raw · 1 record	99+6 to the score	4th	—no page
8	Jessica PierreUniversity and Capstone Provisional	7580 raw · 1 record	99+6 to the score	3rd	—no page
9	Antonio Taiga GuterresUniversity and Capstone Provisional	7483 raw · 1 record	84+2 to the score	3rd	—no page
10	Zachary TepperUniversity and Capstone Provisional	7378 raw · 1 record	99+6 to the score	0th	—no page
11	Shannon ZarubaUniversity and Capstone Provisional	7175 raw · 1 record	99+6 to the score	0th	—no page
12	Terrance SingletonUniversity and Capstone Provisional	7075 raw · 1 record	99+6 to the score	0th	—no page

All 12 instructors listed.

8 of 12 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach, not a figure about this class.

How this board is built and ordered

Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Curve is the instructor's score for THIS class only, ranked against every instructor we hold and printed back out of 100, with the raw BC average underneath it; nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Easiness is an adjustment on top of it, worth up to about ±6 — BC's workload item, ranked and turned over, so a lighter section gains and a heavier one loses, while an ordinary one changes nothing — and each row prints the adjustment, signed. The board is ordered on the same figure it prints, adjusted for how many records back it. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item shown as a rank against every class we hold; students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it is not a measure of difficulty or grading, and it is never marked better or worse.

That site has no course dimension, so its figure is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 24 records

Instructor4

Course3

Feedback3

Workload & Challengenot ratings

Bars are ranks, not raw scores. Nothing here is graded good or bad.

What each item asks

Explains Clearly: The instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.
Available: The instructor was available for help outside of class.
Motivating: The instructor motivated me to do my best work.
Sparks Interest: The course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.
Organized: The course was well organized.
Clear Goals: The learning objectives for the course were clear.
Useful Later: What I learned is applicable beyond this course.
Assignments: Assignments and exams contributed to my learning.
Fast Feedback: I received feedback on my work in a timely manner.
Useful Feedback: The feedback I received on my work was meaningful.
Workload: How much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.
Challenge: The course was intellectually challenging.
Attendance: Attending class was necessary to do well in this course.

Why these numbers are curved

Both the number and the bar are the rank against every comparable record we hold, printed back out of 100. BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so on the raw scale every cell here would read in the high eighties and every bar would be nearly full — thirteen numbers that tell you nothing. Each cell prints its raw BC figure and its percentile underneath, so nothing is hidden by the transform. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

24 sections · newest first

Instructor	Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Kristin Reed	Spring 2026	01	89	84	20
Kylie Windecker	Spring 2026	01	89	84	20
Jessica Pierre	Spring 2026	02	80	73	20
Phionna-Cayola Claude	Spring 2026	03	86	80	20
Kylie Windecker	Spring 2025	01	90	76	20
Alison Park	Spring 2025	02	82	75	20
Phionna-Cayola Claude	Spring 2025	03	96	96	20
Kristin Reed	Spring 2024	01	82	71	20
Kylie Windecker	Spring 2024	01	84	71	20
Phionna-Cayola Claude	Spring 2024	02	96	83	40
Antonio Taiga Guterres	Spring 2024	03	83	78	40
Mitchell Strzepek	Spring 2024	03	85	78	40
Mitchell Strzepek	Fall 2023	01	88	83	20
Howard Thrasher	Spring 2023	01	82	63	20
Zachary Tepper	Spring 2023	01	78	63	20
Shannon Zaruba	Spring 2023	02	75	67	20
Terrance Singleton	Spring 2023	02	75	67	20
Mitchell Strzepek	Spring 2023	03	89	73	20
Phionna-Cayola Claude	Spring 2023	03	95	73	20
Howard Thrasher	Fall 2022	01	92	100	20
Mitchell Strzepek	Fall 2022	01	96	100	20
Howard Thrasher	Spring 2022	01	85	63	20
Jasmine Mahoney	Spring 2022	02	83	50	20
Mitchell Strzepek	Spring 2022	03	69	57	20

How to read this board

Instructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.