TMPS 7331
Fundamental Ethical Questions in Faith-Based, Nonprofit Management · 2 instructors on record · 2 sections
The class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it — who taught it is the board below.
How is this worked out?
That is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between: the board carries each instructor's own score for this class, and the score above is the class averaged across all of them.
Not reported in these records — which is missing data, not an easy class.
How is this worked out?
Boston College's “intellectually challenging” question was not reported in these records, so there is nothing to show. That is missing data, not an easy class.
Not reported in these records — which is missing data, not a light class.
How is this worked out?
Boston College's workload question was not reported in these records, so there is nothing to show. That is missing data, not a light class.
This four-week, 1-credit module introduces students to a faith-informed framework for ethical leadership and decision-making within faith-based nonprofit organizations. Integrating organizational ethics, moral theology, and Catholic social teaching, the module invites students to discern how values become embodiedor distortedthrough policies, practices, and culture. Topics include power and accountability, financial integrity, equity and justice, and the cultivation of ethical organizational climates. The students will explore how to lead with integrity in the face of complex moral dilemmas. Emphasis is placed on executive leadership as moral discernment in action: fostering trust, transparency, and justice in service of mission. Students are required to join a live, synchronous conversation with an expert on Thursdays as well as meet in small learning communities once a week (by arrangement).
Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them.
| Rank | Instructor | Curve | Easiness | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Brenda Noriega-FloresTheology and Ministry Provisional | —— raw · 1 record | — | — |
| — | Hosffman OspinoTheology and Ministry Provisional | —— raw · 1 record | — | — |
2 of 2 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. Neither workload nor challenge was reported in any record for this class, so both columns are dashes — that is missing data, not a zero.
How this board is built and ordered
Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.
Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Curve is the instructor's score for THIS class only, ranked against every instructor we hold and printed back out of 100, with the raw BC average underneath it; nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Easiness is an adjustment on top of it, worth up to about ±6 — BC's workload item, ranked and turned over, so a lighter section gains and a heavier one loses, while an ordinary one changes nothing — and each row prints the adjustment, signed. The board is ordered on the same figure it prints, adjusted for how many records back it. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item shown as a rank against every class we hold; students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it is not a measure of difficulty or grading, and it is never marked better or worse.
The line
All 13 items · means across 2 recordsNone of the evaluation questions were reported for these records.
Game log
2 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Noriega-Flores | Spring 2026 | 01 | — | — | — |
| Hosffman Ospino | Spring 2026 | 01 | — | — | — |
How to read this board
Instructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.