Class record · SCWK · SSW

SCWK 9944

Field Education IV Macro · 17 instructors on record · 21 sections

What the course score is made of

79BC evaluations21 records · weight ×1.0 · Spring 2023 – Spring 2026

—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute

—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.

What the challenge rank is made of

25thMore challenging than 25% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

86BC — “Intellectually Challenging”21 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of

94thMore work than 94% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

83BC — “Workload”21 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

The board

17 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Find an instructor among the 17Filters the rows below. Positions are always against the whole class, so a rank does not change when the list is narrowed.

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them.

Rank	Instructor	Overall	Workload	Challenge	RMP overall
1	Joseph Mc LaughlinSocial Work Provisional	1002 records	100th	58th	—no page
2	Melissa HalliseySocial Work Provisional	1002 records	100th	9th	—no page
3	Timothy WilliamsSocial Work Provisional	1002 records	100th	100th	—no page
4	Devorath RuizSocial Work Provisional	1001 record	—	—	—no page
5	Emily Greising RemenschneiderSocial Work Provisional	1001 record	—	—	—no page
6	Julia MacmahonSocial Work Provisional	1001 record	25th	0th	401 rating · all classes
7	Lyndsey McmahanSocial Work Provisional	1001 record	—	69th	—no page
8	Marie MathieuSocial Work Provisional	1001 record	—	—	—no page
9	Nicole DowningSocial Work Provisional	1001 record	—	—	—no page
10	William HowardSocial Work Provisional	1001 record	100th	100th	—no page
11	Karin ElliottSocial Work Provisional	901 record	100th	48th	—no page
12	Rebecca CamargoSocial Work Provisional	701 record	—	48th	—no page
13	Sandee TisdaleSocial Work Provisional	672 records	0th	0th	—no page
—	Carrie JohnsonSocial Work Provisional	—1 record	—	—	—no page
—	Erika HamelSocial Work Provisional	—1 record	—	—	—no page
—	Tatiana SchettiniSocial Work Provisional	—1 record	—	—	—no page
—	Ximena SotoSocial Work Provisional	—1 record	—	—	—no page

All 17 instructors listed.

How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 17 of 17 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 21 records

The Professor4 items

Clearly Explains MaterialThe instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.

8923rd pctl

Available Outside of ClassThe instructor was available for help outside of class.

9450th pctl

Brings Out Your Best WorkThe instructor motivated me to do my best work.

9134th pctl

Sparked My InterestThe course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.

9022nd pctl

The Course3 items

Well-Organized CourseThe course was well organized.

8832nd pctl

Clear Learning GoalsThe learning objectives for the course were clear.

9038th pctl

Useful Beyond the CourseWhat I learned is applicable beyond this course.

839th pctl

Assignments & Feedback3 items

Assignments Help You LearnAssignments and exams contributed to my learning.

774th pctl

Gives Feedback PromptlyI received feedback on my work in a timely manner.

9044th pctl

Meaningful FeedbackThe feedback I received on my work was meaningful.

9039th pctl

Workload, difficulty & attendanceNot ratings

WorkloadHow much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.

8394th pctl

Intellectually ChallengingThe course was intellectually challenging.

8625th pctl

Attendance MattersAttending class was necessary to do well in this course.

8317th pctl

Bar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

21 sections · newest first

Instructor	Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Nicole Downing	Spring 2026	02	100	80	—
Erika Hamel	Spring 2026	03	—	—	—
Emily Greising Remenschneider	Spring 2026	04	100	—	—
Carrie Johnson	Spring 2026	05	—	—	—
Marie Mathieu	Spring 2026	06	100	40	—
Julia Macmahon	Spring 2026	07	100	100	40
Joseph Mc Laughlin	Spring 2026	08	100	100	100
Devorath Ruiz	Spring 2026	09	100	60	—
Ximena Soto	Spring 2026	10	—	—	—
Sandee Tisdale	Spring 2026	11	—	—	—
Tatiana Schettini	Spring 2026	12	—	100	—
Melissa Hallisey	Spring 2026	13	—	—	—
Timothy Williams	Spring 2026	15	—	100	100
Rebecca Camargo	Spring 2023	03	70	80	—
Karin Elliott	Spring 2023	04	90	90	100
William Howard	Spring 2023	08	100	96	100
Lyndsey Mcmahan	Spring 2023	09	100	87	—
Joseph Mc Laughlin	Spring 2023	10	100	80	100
Sandee Tisdale	Spring 2023	11	67	40	20
Melissa Hallisey	Spring 2023	14	100	60	100
Timothy Williams	Spring 2023	15	100	—	—

How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.