POLI 4931
Honors Seminar · 2 instructors on record · 2 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
This course is restricted to Political Science Honors Program seniors first and any remaining seats are open to Political Science Honors Program juniors. This course is by permission only. Honors Seminar: Essays in Command. Command is at the very essence of political life, but, like humor, it does not lend itself readily to abstract consideration. Better to study it by looking at actual commanders and what they do or fail to do. This seminar consists of reading and discussing essays about concrete examples of command decision making. Among those we will read are: George Orwell's on Gandhi's strategy of revolutionary leadership; Murray Kempton's on Dwight Eisenhower's distinctive approach to presidential command; John Maynard Keynes' on the power dynamics involved as French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau, British Prime Minister Lloyd George and American President Woodrow Wilson contend with one another to put their stamp on the peace treaty to be imposed on Germany, and, Henry Adams on William Seward's dexterous congressional leadership during the Secession Winter of 1860. Because these essays and the others we shall read presume background knowledge that the seminar participants may not possess, supplementary reading will be provided to supply sufficient background. The night before each meeting, participants will submit two "conversation starters", questions or themes stimulated by the weeks reading that they would like to have discussed. For their final research paper students will consult with me to devise a topic that enables them to go beyond the class reading and discussion to deepen their understanding of political command.
Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them.
| Rank | Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge | RMP overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kay SchlozmanPolitical Science Provisional | 801 record | 78th | 48th | —no page |
| 2 | Alice BehnegarProfessor of the Practice · Political Science Provisional | 741 record | 78th | 69th | 6615 ratings · all classes |
How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.
Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 2 of 2 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.
The line
All 13 items · means across 2 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
2 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alice Behnegar | Fall 2024 | 01 | 74 | 74 | 60 |
| Kay Schlozman | Fall 2022 | 01 | 80 | 79 | 60 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.