Carney Curve

Boston College course evaluations · every published number, ranked class by class

Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted.

Class record · PHYS · MCAS

PHYS 2100

Introduction to Physics I (Calculus) · 11 instructors on record · 34 sections

What the course score is made of
67BC evaluations34 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2021 – Fall 2025
Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute
RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.

What the challenge rank is made of
39thMore challenging than 39% of BC classesranked against every one we hold
89BC — “Intellectually Challenging”34 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of
48thMore work than 48% of BC classesranked against every one we hold
59BC — “Workload”34 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

PHYS2050 is the laboratory course to supplement the lecture course material. First semester of a two-semester calculus-based introduction to physics primarily for biology majors and premedical students. The development and application of classical physical principles are covered, and students are introduced to more advanced mathematical techniques to extend these applications. Emphasis is placed on problem-solving to better understand the implications of these principles, as well as to develop analytical skills. Topics include classical mechanics, including Newton's laws, energy, rotational motion, hydrostatics and fluid dynamics, oscillations, waves, and gravitation.

The board

11 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 3 of the 11 rows carry a mark saying so.

RankInstructorOverallWorkloadChallengeRMP overall
1Alexander AunerAssistant Professor of the Practice and Undergraduate Program Director · Physics895 records93rd89thno page
2Faranak BahramiPhysics Provisional fewer records922 records25th41stno page
3Linden HayesPhysics Provisional fewer records1001 record9thno page
4Alexander LafleurPhysics Provisional892 recordsno page
5Mohamed Al BegaoweKempa Group · Physics Provisional862 records39th36thno page
6Kaelyn DauerPhysics Provisional832 records25th12thno page
7Taichi MurakamiFlebus Group · Physics Provisional752 records39th18thno page
8G M Dinuka GallabaPhysics6810 records78th51stno page
9Jan EngelbrechtPhysics Provisional562 records93rd9th1001 rating · all classes
10Shrinkhala SharmaPhysics Provisional fewer records472 recordsno page
11Michael SanchezPhysics514 records25th6thno page

How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 8 of 11 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 34 records
The Professor4 items
Clearly Explains MaterialThe instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.
839th pctl
Available Outside of ClassThe instructor was available for help outside of class.
8612th pctl
Brings Out Your Best WorkThe instructor motivated me to do my best work.
8514th pctl
Sparked My InterestThe course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.
859th pctl
The Course3 items
Well-Organized CourseThe course was well organized.
8012th pctl
Clear Learning GoalsThe learning objectives for the course were clear.
8312th pctl
Useful Beyond the CourseWhat I learned is applicable beyond this course.
805th pctl
Assignments & Feedback3 items
Assignments Help You LearnAssignments and exams contributed to my learning.
8519th pctl
Gives Feedback PromptlyI received feedback on my work in a timely manner.
8115th pctl
Meaningful FeedbackThe feedback I received on my work was meaningful.
8212th pctl
Workload, difficulty & attendanceNot ratings
WorkloadHow much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.
5948th pctl
Intellectually ChallengingThe course was intellectually challenging.
8939th pctl
Attendance MattersAttending class was necessary to do well in this course.
8316th pctl

Bar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

34 sections · newest first
InstructorTermSecInstrCourseWork
G M Dinuka GallabaFall 202501666760
G M Dinuka GallabaFall 202502646360
Taichi MurakamiFall 202506807340
Mohamed Al BegaoweFall 202507917840
Taichi MurakamiFall 202508695860
Mohamed Al BegaoweFall 202510806860
Alexander AunerSummer 2025019378100
Alexander AunerSummer 202502808040
Alexander AunerSummer 2025038767
Alexander AunerSummer 202504959580
G M Dinuka GallabaFall 202401484760
G M Dinuka GallabaFall 202402535460
Alexander AunerSummer 2024019173100
G M Dinuka GallabaFall 2023016967
G M Dinuka GallabaFall 2023026559
Michael SanchezFall 2023045145
Shrinkhala SharmaFall 2023055254
Michael SanchezFall 2023064146
Alexander LafleurFall 2023088477
Alexander LafleurFall 2023109377
Shrinkhala SharmaFall 2023114250
Jan EngelbrechtSummer 2023017169
G M Dinuka GallabaFall 202201797160
G M Dinuka GallabaFall 202202746960
Kaelyn DauerFall 2022048670

Showing the first 25.

How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.