Carney Curve

Boston College course evaluations · every published number, ranked class by class

Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted.

Class record · MFIN · CSOM

MFIN 1127

Corporate Finance · 9 instructors on record · 83 sections

What the course score is made of
80BC evaluations83 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2021 – Spring 2026
Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute
RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.

What the challenge rank is made of
58thMore challenging than 58% of BC classesranked against every one we hold
92BC — “Intellectually Challenging”83 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of
43rdMore work than 43% of BC classesranked against every one we hold
54BC — “Workload”83 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

This course is designed to teach the techniques of financial analysis and the management of a firm's sources and uses of funds. Topics treated intensively include financial statement analysis, techniques of financial forecasting, operating and financial leverage, working capital management, capital budgeting, leasing, and long term finance. The teaching method will be a combination of lectures, problems, and cases.

The board

9 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 1 of the 9 rows carry a mark saying so.

RankInstructorOverallWorkloadChallengeRMP overall
1Nadya MalenkoTim and Debbie Connors Family Professor · Finance937 records26th60thno page
2Aimee SmithFinance8738 records46th64th846 ratings · all classes
3Angela MaAssistant Professor · Finance fewer records885 records46th63rd902 ratings · all classes
4Rawley HeimerFinance Provisional882 records25th41stno page
5Simcha BarkaiAssistant Professor · Finance8510 records78th63rd947 ratings · all classes
6Arup GangulyAssistant Professor of the Practice · Finance843 records78th85th9446 ratings · all classes
7Manuel LancastreAssociate Professor of the Practice · Finance824 records25th51stno page
8Michael BarryProfessor of the Practice · Finance769 records41st76thno page
9Elliott SmithFinance545 records33rd4th6411 ratings · all classes

How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 1 of 9 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 83 records
The Professor4 items
Clearly Explains MaterialThe instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.
8822nd pctl
Available Outside of ClassThe instructor was available for help outside of class.
9346th pctl
Brings Out Your Best WorkThe instructor motivated me to do my best work.
8926th pctl
Sparked My InterestThe course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.
8919th pctl
The Course3 items
Well-Organized CourseThe course was well organized.
9044th pctl
Clear Learning GoalsThe learning objectives for the course were clear.
9144th pctl
Useful Beyond the CourseWhat I learned is applicable beyond this course.
9034th pctl
Assignments & Feedback3 items
Assignments Help You LearnAssignments and exams contributed to my learning.
8519th pctl
Gives Feedback PromptlyI received feedback on my work in a timely manner.
9253rd pctl
Meaningful FeedbackThe feedback I received on my work was meaningful.
8935th pctl
Workload, difficulty & attendanceNot ratings
WorkloadHow much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.
5443rd pctl
Intellectually ChallengingThe course was intellectually challenging.
9258th pctl
Attendance MattersAttending class was necessary to do well in this course.
8417th pctl

Bar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

83 sections · newest first
InstructorTermSecInstrCourseWork
Aimee SmithSpring 202601847540
Aimee SmithSpring 202602857960
Aimee SmithSpring 202603858060
Nadya MalenkoSpring 202604948640
Nadya MalenkoSpring 202605928740
Manuel LancastreSpring 202606777840
Manuel LancastreSpring 202607918740
Arup GangulySpring 202608858460
Arup GangulySpring 202609827660
Simcha BarkaiFall 202501848360
Simcha BarkaiFall 202502817860
Angela MaFall 202503858360
Angela MaFall 202504939060
Angela MaFall 202505918460
Aimee SmithFall 202506858040
Aimee SmithFall 202507827560
Aimee SmithFall 202508827860
Aimee SmithSummer 20250110097
Aimee SmithSummer 202502938760
Nadya MalenkoSpring 202501938840
Nadya MalenkoSpring 202502918740
Aimee SmithSpring 202503868060
Aimee SmithSpring 202504868160
Aimee SmithSpring 202505908060
Arup GangulySpring 202506857960

Showing the first 25.

How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.