Carney Curve

Boston College course evaluations · Fall 2021 through Spring 2026, ranked class by class

How this list is ordered

Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted.

Class record · LAWS · LAW

LAWS 8856

MA Attorney General Civil Litigation Program · 2 instructors on record · 20 sections

How the curve score is built
91Teaching97 raw · 91st percentile of BC classes
−4Easiness adjustmenteasiness 60 · 87 raw workload · lighter than 6% of BC classes
87Curve scorethe teaching curve −4 for the workload · at most ±6 either way

Boston College's ratings are bunched at the top — the median instructor averages about 88 out of 100 on the raw scale, and 44% of them clear 90 — so a raw score cannot separate anybody. Every figure here is ranked against BC classes and that rank is re-expressed out of 100, which is what turns a raw 88 — the middle of the university — into a figure that says where somebody actually stands. On this scale 77 is the median, 84 the top quarter and 91 the top tenth. Workload is then an adjustment on top of that, worth nothing at all for an ordinary one. Lighter work than 6% of BC classes.

What the course score is made of
97BC evaluations20 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2021 – Spring 2026
—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute
—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

The class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it — who taught it is the board below.

How is this worked out?

That is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between: the board carries each instructor's own score for this class, and the score above is the class averaged across all of them.

What the challenge rank is made of
84thMore challenging than 84% of BC classesranked against every one we hold
96BC — “Intellectually Challenging”20 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question. It is not a measure of difficulty, grading or workload.

How is this worked out?

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of
94thMore work than 94% of BC classesranked against every one we hold
87BC — “Workload”20 records · raw score out of 100

One of Boston College's five workload bands, not a number of hours. Higher means more work, not worse.

How is this worked out?

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

The Mass. Attorney General's Civil Litigation Clinical Program provides an intensive full-year clinical experience in civil litigation in the Government Bureau of the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General (AGO). Students practice under the supervision of one of two faculty members who are assistant attorneys general in that Bureau. Students work directly with Bureau attorneys in representing state agencies and officials in state and federal courts. The clinic teaches litigation skills and strategy and includes the following types of legal work: (1) drafting pleadings, motions, discovery requests and responses, and other litigation documents; (2) legal research and brief writing in the trial and appellate courts; (3) possible oral argument in state courts; and (4) other litigation tasks including taking and defending depositions. Students will be expected to do a significant amount of legal writing. Pursuant to Rule 3:03 of the Supreme Judicial Court, students may argue orally in Superior Court on behalf of state agencies. Students should plan to be eligible for certification under Rule 3:03 at the beginning of the fall semester. Students will be assigned to one of two Divisions in the Government Bureau, either the Constitutional & Administrative Law Division or the Trial Division. The co-directors will make best efforts to assign each student to the division of their preference, subject to space in the divisions. Students assigned to the Constitutional & Administrative Law Division will work on a variety of court cases involving administrative and constitutional law, federal courts, and statutory construction. Students assigned to the Trial Division will work on a variety of cases involving employment, tort, contracts, eminent domain, and land use law. Students receive written and oral comments on their memoranda and written evaluations of their performance. The clinical program includes a weekly two-hour seminar on litigation skills, substantive law topics, and the discussion of student work. Some of the seminars will be conducted jointly with the students assigned to both divisions; other seminars will be specific to each division. Topics include state and federal jurisdiction, the substantive law practiced in each division, drafting litigation documents, motion practice, discovery and depositions, trial preparation, appellate practice, and the role of state attorneys general. The program will select up to 8 third-year students. Each selection is subject to (1) a background check conducted by the AGO and (2) the AGO Intern/Clinical Student Conflict of Interest Statement, which is available in the application materials distributed by BC Law. Students must commit 22 hours per week (including the two-hour seminar but excluding commuting time) to the program. A typical schedule will involve two days at the AGO at One Ashburton Place in Boston and one day (or half-day) remote; students are free to select their usual hours (other than the seminar time at the AGO). The Attorney Generals Office is an Equal Opportunity Employer. As the representative of the Commonwealth and its residents, the Attorney Generals Office strives to ensure that those working in our office reflect the diversity of the communities we serve. The Office encourages applicants from a broad spectrum of backgrounds to apply for positions.

The board

2 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 2

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them.

RankInstructorCurveEasinessChallenge
1James SweeneyLaw9299 raw · 10 records57−5 to the score84th
2Thomas BarnicoLaw9098 raw · 10 records57−5 to the score84th
How this board is built and ordered

Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Curve is the instructor's score for THIS class only, ranked against every instructor we hold and printed back out of 100, with the raw BC average underneath it; nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Easiness is an adjustment on top of it, worth up to about ±6 — BC's workload item, ranked and turned over, so a lighter section gains and a heavier one loses, while an ordinary one changes nothing — and each row prints the adjustment, signed. The board is ordered on the same figure it prints, adjusted for how many records back it. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item shown as a rank against every class we hold; students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it is not a measure of difficulty or grading, and it is never marked better or worse.

The line

All 13 items · means across 20 records
Instructor4
Course3
Feedback3
Workload & Challengenot ratings

Bars are ranks, not raw scores. Nothing here is graded good or bad.

What each item asks
Explains Clearly
The instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.
Available
The instructor was available for help outside of class.
Motivating
The instructor motivated me to do my best work.
Sparks Interest
The course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.
Organized
The course was well organized.
Clear Goals
The learning objectives for the course were clear.
Useful Later
What I learned is applicable beyond this course.
Assignments
Assignments and exams contributed to my learning.
Fast Feedback
I received feedback on my work in a timely manner.
Useful Feedback
The feedback I received on my work was meaningful.
Workload
How much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.
Challenge
The course was intellectually challenging.
Attendance
Attending class was necessary to do well in this course.
Why these numbers are curved

Both the number and the bar are the rank against every comparable record we hold, printed back out of 100. BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so on the raw scale every cell here would read in the high eighties and every bar would be nearly full — thirteen numbers that tell you nothing. Each cell prints its raw BC figure and its percentile underneath, so nothing is hidden by the transform. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

20 sections · newest first
InstructorTermSecInstrCourseWork
James SweeneySpring 202601100100100
Thomas BarnicoSpring 202601100100100
James SweeneyFall 2025011009240
Thomas BarnicoFall 202501969240
James SweeneySpring 20250110095100
Thomas BarnicoSpring 20250110095100
James SweeneyFall 2024019696100
Thomas BarnicoFall 2024019696100
James SweeneySpring 2024019794100
Thomas BarnicoSpring 2024019794100
James SweeneyFall 2023019696—
Thomas BarnicoFall 2023019696—
James SweeneySpring 202301100100100
Thomas BarnicoSpring 202301100100100
James SweeneyFall 202201100100100
Thomas BarnicoFall 20220195100100
James SweeneySpring 20220110010040
Thomas BarnicoSpring 20220110010040
James SweeneyFall 202101100100100
Thomas BarnicoFall 202101100100100
How to read this board

Instructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.