Carney Curve

Boston College course evaluations · every published number, ranked class by class

Positions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted.

Class record · INTL · MCAS

INTL 4941

International Studies Senior Seminar · 10 instructors on record · 22 sections

What the course score is made of
84BC evaluations22 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2021 – Spring 2026
Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute
RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.

What the challenge rank is made of
64thMore challenging than 64% of BC classesranked against every one we hold
93BC — “Intellectually Challenging”22 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of
46thMore work than 46% of BC classesranked against every one we hold
56BC — “Workload”22 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

Open only to Seniors majoring in International Studies This seminar is required of seniors majoring in International Studies. It provides participants with a common vocabulary for analyzing the current international environment politically, economically, and socially. It also examines how to integrate cultural questions and expression into the discipline. Students will explore possibilities for future global relationships in an informed and constructive way and exchange their views, questions, and research in an atmosphere of mutual respect and trust. Visit our website and see the Courses page for a list of senor seminars and their specific course descriptions.

The board

10 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 2 of the 10 rows carry a mark saying so.

RankInstructorOverallWorkloadChallengeRMP overall
1Erik OwensProfessor of the Practice; Director, International Studies Program · Theology963 records78th84th1001 rating · all classes
2Joseph GetzoffInternational Studies Provisional fewer records972 records80thno page
3Brian GareauProfessor, Senior Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs · Sociology Provisional972 records78th61stno page
4Hiroshi NakazatoInternational Studies Provisional932 records78th69thno page
5Matthew SienkiewiczCommunication Provisional892 records78th75thno page
6Aaron MedlinInternational Studies Provisional891 record78th89thno page
7Danial LashkariInternational Studies Provisional fewer records851 record64thno page
8Ingu HwangInternational Studies873 records78th50th8816 ratings · all classes
9Elizabeth ProdromouInternational Studies853 records25th44thno page
10Jonathan KirshnerVincent Q. and Mary Ann Giffuni Professor · Political Science743 records43rd50thno page

How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 6 of 10 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 22 records
The Professor4 items
Clearly Explains MaterialThe instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.
9136th pctl
Available Outside of ClassThe instructor was available for help outside of class.
9452nd pctl
Brings Out Your Best WorkThe instructor motivated me to do my best work.
9244th pctl
Sparked My InterestThe course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.
9232nd pctl
The Course3 items
Well-Organized CourseThe course was well organized.
9043rd pctl
Clear Learning GoalsThe learning objectives for the course were clear.
8936th pctl
Useful Beyond the CourseWhat I learned is applicable beyond this course.
9141st pctl
Assignments & Feedback3 items
Assignments Help You LearnAssignments and exams contributed to my learning.
9040th pctl
Gives Feedback PromptlyI received feedback on my work in a timely manner.
8939th pctl
Meaningful FeedbackThe feedback I received on my work was meaningful.
9146th pctl
Workload, difficulty & attendanceNot ratings
WorkloadHow much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.
5646th pctl
Intellectually ChallengingThe course was intellectually challenging.
9364th pctl
Attendance MattersAttending class was necessary to do well in this course.
9355th pctl

Bar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

22 sections · newest first
InstructorTermSecInstrCourseWork
Aaron MedlinSpring 202601898360
Erik OwensSpring 2026021009560
Elizabeth ProdromouSpring 202603878440
Brian GareauFall 202501958860
Elizabeth ProdromouSpring 2025017880
Joseph GetzoffSpring 2025029898
Jonathan KirshnerSpring 202503726440
Brian GareauFall 202401999760
Elizabeth ProdromouSpring 202401898440
Joseph GetzoffSpring 2024029696
Hiroshi NakazatoFall 2023019390
Ingu HwangFall 2023027774
Danial LashkariSpring 2023018584
Erik OwensSpring 202302877860
Matthew SienkiewiczFall 202201847760
Ingu HwangFall 202202989460
Jonathan KirshnerFall 202203907360
Jonathan KirshnerSpring 202201605260
Erik OwensSpring 2022021009260
Hiroshi NakazatoSpring 202203938760
Matthew SienkiewiczFall 202101939660
Ingu HwangFall 202102868460

How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.