GERM 2004
German for Professional Purposes · 1 instructor on record · 5 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
This language course is designed for students interested in living in a German-speaking country and want to use German in a professional setting. Students will develop presentation skills necessary to be successful at work in Germany. Topics covered include sustainability, the political landscape, social benefits, cultural differences, and expectations when working or studying in a German-speaking environment. Students will learn about organizations and companies that offer opportunities for BC students such as Congress Bundestag Youth Exchange and Fulbright. A visit to a German company is also planned. Not suitable for native speakers of German.
| Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruth SondermannAdjunct Instructor, German Studies · Eastern, Slavic, and German Studies | 925 records | 39th | 24th |
There is no ranking to read here: Ruth Sondermann is the only instructor with evaluation records for GERM 2004, so the number is a record, not a position.
Also taught by Ruth Sondermann
6 other classesOther GERM classes
All of themThe line
All 13 items · means across 5 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
5 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruth Sondermann | Fall 2025 | 01 | 88 | 88 | 60 |
| Ruth Sondermann | Fall 2024 | 01 | 85 | 80 | 40 |
| Ruth Sondermann | Fall 2023 | 01 | 96 | 96 | — |
| Ruth Sondermann | Fall 2022 | 01 | 92 | 92 | 60 |
| Ruth Sondermann | Fall 2021 | 01 | 100 | 87 | 40 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.