FORM 1051
Reimagining School and Society · 10 instructors on record · 23 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
As products of schooling, we find it natural, invisible, inevitable. And yet, modern mass schooling is a relatively recent and-with a little distance-rather strange invention. To defamiliarize this peculiar institution, this course weighs the affordances and limitations of formal and informal education, considers the historical forces that led to the rise of compulsory schooling, and explores the felt experience of being schooled. Through reading and discussion of primary texts in the social sciences and humanities, we examine the official purposes and hidden curriculum of schools, asking questions such as: Does schooling aim to socialize or to individualize? How can it serve both liberal and vocational aims? How do schools shape character and social interaction? What sort of knowledge is valorized in school? Who sets the curriculum in pluralistic society? and, Is schooling a force for social change or social reproduction? We will consider how schools might be reimagined to deal with the great educational challenges of the day. What civic education is needed to deal with entrenched inequality, surging xenophobia, fraying democracy, and the post-truth condition? How does the heedless embrace of deformative technologies set new challenges and tasks for schooling? How must education evolve in light of the climate emergency? As students, you need to understand the institution that shaped you. As citizens, you need to think about how we can reimagine school and society.
Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them.
| Rank | Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge | RMP overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garo SaraydarianFormative Education | 967 records | 28th | 31st | 10011 ratings · all classes |
| 2 | Jieun SungFormative Education Provisional | 951 record | 25th | 25th | —no page |
| 3 | Whitney HegsethEducation Provisional | 941 record | 25th | 12th | —no page |
| 4 | Jeremy AlexanderFormative Education | 925 records | 30th | 29th | —no page |
| 5 | Kirubahari MurugaiahTeacher Education and Currriculum and Instruction Provisional | 922 records | 25th | 36th | —no page |
| 6 | Samantha DeaneFormative Education | 913 records | 25th | 19th | —no page |
| 7 | Christopher HigginsFormative Education Provisional | 871 record | 25th | 15th | —no page |
| 8 | Rebecca SullivanFormative Education Provisional | 871 record | 25th | 15th | —no page |
| 9 | Ksenia FilatovFormative Education Provisional | 821 record | 25th | 25th | —no page |
| 10 | Gilda MorelliCounseling, Developmental, and Educational Psychology Provisional | 761 record | 78th | 9th | 402 ratings · all classes |
How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.
Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 7 of 10 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.
The line
All 13 items · means across 23 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
23 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garo Saraydarian | Spring 2026 | 02 | 93 | 90 | 60 |
| Garo Saraydarian | Spring 2026 | 03 | 98 | 95 | 40 |
| Jeremy Alexander | Spring 2026 | 04 | 95 | 92 | 40 |
| Jieun Sung | Fall 2025 | 01 | 95 | 92 | 40 |
| Jeremy Alexander | Fall 2025 | 02 | 91 | 91 | 40 |
| Ksenia Filatov | Spring 2025 | 01 | 82 | 78 | 40 |
| Garo Saraydarian | Spring 2025 | 02 | 96 | 89 | — |
| Whitney Hegseth | Spring 2025 | 03 | 94 | 91 | 40 |
| Jeremy Alexander | Spring 2025 | 04 | 97 | 87 | 60 |
| Garo Saraydarian | Fall 2024 | 01 | 98 | 97 | 40 |
| Rebecca Sullivan | Fall 2024 | 02 | 87 | 80 | 40 |
| Kirubahari Murugaiah | Spring 2024 | 01 | 88 | 84 | 40 |
| Garo Saraydarian | Spring 2024 | 02 | 99 | 100 | 40 |
| Jeremy Alexander | Spring 2024 | 03 | 84 | 80 | — |
| Samantha Deane | Spring 2024 | 04 | 89 | 84 | 40 |
| Jeremy Alexander | Spring 2024 | 05 | 93 | 85 | — |
| Garo Saraydarian | Fall 2023 | 01 | 93 | 91 | — |
| Samantha Deane | Fall 2023 | 02 | 93 | 86 | — |
| Kirubahari Murugaiah | Spring 2023 | 01 | 96 | 91 | — |
| Garo Saraydarian | Spring 2023 | 02 | 98 | 96 | 40 |
| Christopher Higgins | Spring 2023 | 03 | 87 | 82 | 40 |
| Samantha Deane | Spring 2023 | 04 | 90 | 88 | 40 |
| Gilda Morelli | Fall 2022 | 01 | 76 | 71 | 60 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.