ELHE 7726
Organizational Theory · 6 instructors on record · 20 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
Rather than focusing on traits of the individual leader, this course focuses on the dimensions of organizations and teams that both facilitate and complicate leadership. Examples include managing conflict, developing a shared vision, and differentiating between technical and adaptive change. Students will apply various organizational theories in order to understand group- and system-level patterns in how groups get things done (e.g., structures and resources, symbols and values, power and politics). Ultimately, students leave the course better able to plan and evaluate school improvement through the lenses of organizational theory.
Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 1 of the 6 rows carry a mark saying so.
| Rank | Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge | RMP overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William DriscollEducational Leadership and Higher Education | 977 records | 81st | 82nd | 343 ratings · all classes |
| 2 | Allan CameronEducational Leadership and Higher Education | 975 records | 78th | 64th | —no page |
| 3 | Jill GeiserEducation | 954 records | 93rd | 84th | —no page |
| 4 | Andrew MillerEducational Leadership and Higher Education Provisional fewer records | 1001 record | — | 69th | —no page |
| 5 | Vincent ChoEducational Leadership and Higher Education Provisional | 722 records | 93rd | 52nd | —no page |
| 6 | Martha WhalenAdvancing Studies Provisional | 441 record | 78th | 9th | —no page |
How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.
Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 3 of 6 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.
The line
All 13 items · means across 20 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
20 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allan Cameron | Spring 2026 | 01 | 95 | 91 | 60 |
| Allan Cameron | Fall 2025 | 01 | 96 | 89 | 60 |
| William Driscoll | Fall 2025 | 02 | 98 | 96 | 60 |
| Andrew Miller | Spring 2025 | 01 | 100 | 87 | — |
| William Driscoll | Fall 2024 | 01 | 98 | 93 | 60 |
| Vincent Cho | Summer 2024 | 01 | 60 | 62 | 80 |
| William Driscoll | Spring 2024 | 01 | 98 | 96 | 80 |
| Vincent Cho | Fall 2023 | 01 | 84 | 83 | — |
| Allan Cameron | Fall 2023 | 02 | 95 | 91 | — |
| William Driscoll | Fall 2023 | 03 | 87 | 85 | — |
| William Driscoll | Summer 2023 | 01 | 98 | 93 | — |
| Jill Geiser | Spring 2023 | 01 | 97 | 93 | 80 |
| Allan Cameron | Spring 2023 | 02 | 98 | 96 | 60 |
| Jill Geiser | Fall 2022 | 01 | 96 | 91 | 80 |
| William Driscoll | Summer 2022 | 01 | 100 | 100 | 60 |
| Allan Cameron | Summer 2022 | 02 | 100 | 100 | 60 |
| Jill Geiser | Spring 2022 | 01 | 94 | 86 | 80 |
| William Driscoll | Spring 2022 | 02 | 98 | 94 | — |
| Jill Geiser | Fall 2021 | 01 | 93 | 83 | — |
| Martha Whalen | Fall 2021 | 02 | 44 | 56 | 60 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.