Class record · ECON · MCAS

ECON 3372

International Finance · 10 instructors on record · 21 sections

What the course score is made of

73BC evaluations21 records · weight ×1.0 · Fall 2021 – Spring 2026

—Student reviewsno reviews — does not contribute

—RateMyProfessorsno ratings — does not contribute

That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.

What the challenge rank is made of

36thMore challenging than 36% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

88BC — “Intellectually Challenging”21 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.

What the workload rank is made of

41stMore work than 41% of BC classesranked against every one we hold

53BC — “Workload”21 records · raw score out of 100

Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.

Not open to students who have taken ECON3376 International financial markets, international trade and balance of payments issues will be studied by using analytical models of the open economy. Topics of particular interests are exchange rate determination, capital flows, trade flows, and other international linkages between economies. The course will apply the analytical tools of international economics to address macroeconomic aspects of current policy issues such as the global impact of the financial crisis, exchange rate policy, sovereign debt crises, and persistent trade deficits and international indebtedness.

The board

10 instructors · ranked on this class onlyCompare the top 3

Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 3 of the 10 rows carry a mark saying so.

Rank	Instructor	Overall	Workload	Challenge	RMP overall
1	Rosen ValchevEconomics	856 records	28th	44th	—no page
2	Giada BozzelliEconomics Provisional fewer records	1001 record	100th	100th	—no page
3	Tobias MuellerEconomics Provisional	802 records	78th	29th	—no page
4	Christopher MchughAdjunct Professor · Economics Provisional fewer records	811 record	25th	42nd	566 ratings · all classes
5	Liang ZhangEconomics Provisional	801 record	25th	17th	—no page
6	Veysel UlusoyEconomics Provisional	761 record	—	18th	5431 ratings · all classes
7	Sanjay MoorjaniEconomics Provisional fewer records	581 record	—	—	—no page
8	Christian Fernando Velasquez JavierEconomics	673 records	78th	36th	—no page
9	Brian BethuneEconomics	643 records	78th	29th	328 ratings · all classes
10	Yuanchen CaiEconomics Provisional	552 records	25th	14th	—no page

How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.

Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 7 of 10 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.

The line

All 13 items · means across 21 records

The Professor4 items

Clearly Explains MaterialThe instructor was effective at creating an understanding of difficult subject matter.

839th pctl

Available Outside of ClassThe instructor was available for help outside of class.

8715th pctl

Brings Out Your Best WorkThe instructor motivated me to do my best work.

839th pctl

Sparked My InterestThe course stimulated my interest in the subject matter.

836th pctl

The Course3 items

Well-Organized CourseThe course was well organized.

8419th pctl

Clear Learning GoalsThe learning objectives for the course were clear.

8518th pctl

Useful Beyond the CourseWhat I learned is applicable beyond this course.

8410th pctl

Assignments & Feedback3 items

Assignments Help You LearnAssignments and exams contributed to my learning.

8415th pctl

Gives Feedback PromptlyI received feedback on my work in a timely manner.

8215th pctl

Meaningful FeedbackThe feedback I received on my work was meaningful.

8112th pctl

Workload, difficulty & attendanceNot ratings

WorkloadHow much work the course took outside class, on Boston College's five-band scale — the band boundaries are not published, so this is not a number of hours.

5341st pctl

Intellectually ChallengingThe course was intellectually challenging.

8836th pctl

Attendance MattersAttending class was necessary to do well in this course.

754th pctl

Bar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.

Game log

21 sections · newest first

Instructor	Term	Sec	Instr	Course	Work
Christopher Mchugh	Spring 2026	01	81	80	40
Veysel Ulusoy	Spring 2026	02	76	79	—
Rosen Valchev	Fall 2025	01	82	77	40
Liang Zhang	Fall 2025	02	80	76	40
Giada Bozzelli	Summer 2025	01	100	100	100
Yuanchen Cai	Spring 2025	01	55	54	40
Yuanchen Cai	Fall 2024	01	54	55	40
Tobias Mueller	Summer 2024	01	80	80	60
Tobias Mueller	Summer 2024	02	80	87	60
Christian Fernando Velasquez Javier	Spring 2024	01	60	61	60
Christian Fernando Velasquez Javier	Fall 2023	01	74	68	—
Rosen Valchev	Fall 2023	02	86	84	—
Christian Fernando Velasquez Javier	Fall 2023	03	67	63	—
Sanjay Moorjani	Summer 2023	02	58	62	—
Rosen Valchev	Spring 2023	01	86	81	40
Rosen Valchev	Spring 2023	02	85	79	60
Brian Bethune	Fall 2022	01	53	56	60
Brian Bethune	Fall 2022	02	66	70	60
Rosen Valchev	Spring 2022	01	84	74	40
Rosen Valchev	Spring 2022	02	89	84	40
Brian Bethune	Fall 2021	01	72	73	60

How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.