COMM 1010
The Rhetorical Tradition · 3 instructors on record · 20 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
Required course for all Communication majors. This is an introductory course that is designed to examine the classical periods of rhetoric, as well as the Enlightenment and modern periods. The course focuses on pivotal concepts in rhetoric and their application to contemporary discourse. This is a foundation course in the field of communication. It introduces students to perennial issues and concerns in rhetoric and looks at communication as a way of knowing about self and society.
Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them.
| Rank | Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge | RMP overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Celeste WellsCommunication | 9710 records | 26th | 44th | 8621 ratings · all classes |
| 2 | Kalemba KizitoAssistant Professor of the Practice · Communication | 836 records | 25th | 14th | 464 ratings · all classes |
| 3 | Brett IngramCommunication | 794 records | 25th | 14th | 6234 ratings · all classes |
How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.
Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. The RateMyProfessors column is an instructor's overall figure across everything they teach; that site has no course dimension, so it is shown for information and kept out of the ranking.
The line
All 13 items · means across 20 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
20 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celeste Wells | Spring 2026 | 01 | 95 | 89 | 40 |
| Kalemba Kizito | Spring 2026 | 02 | 78 | 70 | 40 |
| Celeste Wells | Fall 2025 | 01 | 97 | 91 | 40 |
| Kalemba Kizito | Fall 2025 | 02 | 81 | 70 | 40 |
| Celeste Wells | Spring 2025 | 01 | 98 | 94 | 40 |
| Kalemba Kizito | Spring 2025 | 02 | 82 | 76 | 40 |
| Celeste Wells | Fall 2024 | 01 | 99 | 94 | 40 |
| Kalemba Kizito | Fall 2024 | 02 | 93 | 84 | 40 |
| Celeste Wells | Spring 2024 | 01 | 97 | 90 | 40 |
| Kalemba Kizito | Spring 2024 | 02 | 88 | 82 | 40 |
| Celeste Wells | Fall 2023 | 01 | 96 | 89 | — |
| Kalemba Kizito | Fall 2023 | 02 | 77 | 70 | — |
| Celeste Wells | Spring 2023 | 01 | 97 | 89 | 40 |
| Brett Ingram | Spring 2023 | 02 | 78 | 77 | 40 |
| Celeste Wells | Fall 2022 | 01 | 95 | 87 | 40 |
| Brett Ingram | Fall 2022 | 02 | 77 | 76 | 40 |
| Celeste Wells | Spring 2022 | 01 | 97 | 92 | 40 |
| Brett Ingram | Spring 2022 | 02 | 87 | 82 | 40 |
| Celeste Wells | Fall 2021 | 01 | 95 | 91 | 60 |
| Brett Ingram | Fall 2021 | 02 | 74 | 74 | 40 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.