ARTS 1105
Making Prints/Making Books: An Introduction to Printmaking and Book Arts · 2 instructors on record · 10 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
In this course, students will be introduced to the world of printmaking and book arts through practical, hands-on assignments. Students will learn to make relief prints, and will leave the class with a book designed from their prints. Art in book form tells a story with words, images, structure, and material. The developmental process of making a print is akin to the building of a narrative. Both of these graphic arts have existed in tandem throughout history. They are ways to communicate ideas to a broader public, so it makes sense to explore them together in the classroom. Students who are just learning to draw and accomplished draftsmen can both benefit from making prints and books. Each assignment will balance technical, conceptual, and formal goals. We will discuss the design basics of line, shape, texture, light and shadow, space, and composition. The printmakers will create series, sequences, and variations on a theme. We will look at books and prints from different eras and cultures, and take advantage of the college's numerous collections. There will be written components, such as an observational response to a single print and a reflection on an individual book work. The students will present their artwork as the focus of group discussion and critique. Additionally, they will receive individual feedback during each class meeting.
Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them.
| Rank | Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kiana BeckmenStudio Art Provisional | 912 records | 25th | 29th |
| 2 | Stephanie StiglianoStudio Art | 908 records | 3rd | 22nd |
How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.
Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 1 of 2 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row.
The line
All 13 items · means across 10 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
10 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiana Beckmen | Spring 2026 | 01 | 87 | 80 | — |
| Kiana Beckmen | Fall 2025 | 01 | 95 | 94 | 40 |
| Stephanie Stigliano | Spring 2025 | 01 | 91 | 91 | 40 |
| Stephanie Stigliano | Fall 2024 | 01 | 97 | 93 | 40 |
| Stephanie Stigliano | Spring 2024 | 01 | 88 | 92 | 20 |
| Stephanie Stigliano | Fall 2023 | 01 | 83 | 85 | — |
| Stephanie Stigliano | Spring 2023 | 01 | 92 | 97 | — |
| Stephanie Stigliano | Fall 2022 | 01 | 91 | 100 | 20 |
| Stephanie Stigliano | Spring 2022 | 01 | 85 | 91 | 40 |
| Stephanie Stigliano | Fall 2021 | 01 | 90 | 94 | 60 |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.