ADEC 7406
Predictive Analytics/Forecasting · 3 instructors on record · 14 sections
That is the class itself, averaged across everyone who taught it. Who taught it, and how each of them scored, is the board below — that is what a student picking a section is actually choosing between.
Boston College's own “intellectually challenging” question for this class only — students answer it positively about courses that stretched them, so it measures intellectual challenge and NOT grading, workload or quality. Almost every BC class scores high on it, which is why it is shown as a rank rather than a score.
Boston College reports workload for this class only as one of five bands, not as a number of hours, and it does not publish what the bands mean — so this site will not translate it into hours. Higher means more work, which is not the same as worse.
Econometrics This course will expose students to the most popular forecasting techniques used in industry. We will cover time series data manipulation and feature creation, including working with transactional and hierarchical time series data as well as methods of evaluating forecasting models. We will cover basic univariate Smoothing and Decomposition methods of forecasting including Moving Averages, ARIMA, Holt-Winters, Unobserved Components Models and various filtering methods (Hodrick-Prescott, Kalman Filter). Time permitting, we will also extend our models to multivariate modeling options such as Vector Autoregressive Models (VAR). We will also discuss forecasting with hierarchical data and the unique challenges that hierarchical reconciliation creates. The course will use the R programming language though no prior experience with R is required.
Scores are real averages. The order also accounts for how many records back each one — the count is under every score — so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. 1 of the 3 rows carry a mark saying so.
| Rank | Instructor | Overall | Workload | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lawrence FultonAdvancing Studies | 938 records | 86th | 63rd |
| 2 | Arvind SharmaAdvancing Studies Provisional fewer records | 952 records | 95th | 93rd |
| 3 | Robert BradleyAdvancing Studies | 774 records | 95th | 23rd |
How this board is orderedPositions account for how many records stand behind each number, so one perfect review does not outrank a semester of them. Every score shown is the real average — only the ordering is adjusted. The comparison here is the class itself: a thin record is read against how this class was rated overall, not against the university.
Every instructor with an evaluation record for this class is on this board — it is not a top ten, and nothing is hidden behind a “show more”. Overall is the instructor's blended score for THIS class only, and its one contributing source is Boston College's evaluations for the sections in the row's record count — nothing on this board is an average across the other things they teach. Workload and Challenge are RANKS against every class we hold, not scores: BC's questions all sit near the top of the 1-5 scale, so a raw number would put almost every row in the high eighties and tell you nothing. Challenge is BC's “intellectually challenging” item, which students answer positively about courses that stretched them — it is not a measure of difficulty or grading. Neither column is ever marked better or worse. 1 of 3 rows are marked provisional: fewer than 3 records stand behind the number. That is thin evidence, not a bad instructor — the record count is in every row.
The line
All 13 items · means across 14 recordsBar length is the rank against every comparable record we hold, not the raw score: BC's questions all have a median around 4.5, so a raw-scale bar would be nearly full on every row and would tell you nothing. Every bar is one ink colour — nothing here is graded green or red. The hatched bars are not ratings at all: a higher number on either describes a different course, not a better one.
Game log
14 sections · newest first| Instructor | Term | Sec | Instr | Course | Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arvind Sharma | Spring 2026 | 01 | 100 | 97 | 80 |
| Lawrence Fulton | Spring 2026 | 02 | 94 | 91 | — |
| Lawrence Fulton | Fall 2025 | 02 | 91 | 97 | 60 |
| Arvind Sharma | Fall 2025 | 03 | 90 | 88 | 100 |
| Lawrence Fulton | Summer 2025 | 01 | 98 | 94 | — |
| Robert Bradley | Spring 2025 | 01 | 78 | 82 | 80 |
| Lawrence Fulton | Spring 2025 | 02 | 100 | 100 | 80 |
| Robert Bradley | Fall 2024 | 01 | 80 | 73 | 100 |
| Lawrence Fulton | Fall 2024 | 02 | 100 | 96 | 60 |
| Lawrence Fulton | Summer 2024 | 01 | 88 | 92 | 80 |
| Robert Bradley | Spring 2024 | 01 | 77 | 73 | — |
| Lawrence Fulton | Spring 2024 | 02 | 95 | 95 | 80 |
| Robert Bradley | Fall 2023 | 01 | 75 | 75 | — |
| Lawrence Fulton | Fall 2023 | 02 | 80 | 85 | — |
How to read this boardInstructors are ranked on their record in this class only, never on their average across everything they teach. Scores are out of 100 — Boston College's 1–5 agreement scale, ×20, the way these numbers were printed for years. Workload is BC's own five-band figure, not a number of hours, and is shown as a rank. A dash means the question was not reported, and is never a zero.